Comment Re:Facepalm (Score 1) 228
EPA fuel economy already includes charging losses. It is "wall to wheels".
So 7.9 miles/ Per day. If you leave the car in the sun all day. Less in the winter.
EPA fuel economy already includes charging losses. It is "wall to wheels".
So 7.9 miles/ Per day. If you leave the car in the sun all day. Less in the winter.
If the monkey selfie isn't copyrighted (in the US at least), is this? Are creative works by computers copyrighted?
And they also cut down on brake dust by using regenerative braking as much as possible.
I think there's some room to move here, to ensure EVs are better on particulates.
Maybe we have to discourage the purchase of 6,000lb Teslas and instead encourage the purchase of 3600lb LEAFs and Bolts.
This thing that particulates being widely considered the most harmful form of air pollution is also new to me. They're a serious problem for sure, but I think other trace emissions like NOx are still quite significant. And that's all ignoring CO2.
Those GPS satellites were put up. There was no requirement for rocket recovery to make that happen.
What this does is make launches cheaper.
How does that affect me?
Bitpay is. Valve will continue to accept only actual money. Bitpay will provide a service (for a fee) of turning your bitcoin into the actual money that Valve demands.
I'm not sure why it's such a big deal. While CO2 heat pumps are new-ish, they aren't groundbreaking.
But move the storage in front to the sides so I can have a drawer. That thing is WAY too thick to not have a drawer at least.
Also, if you could build a pop-up display and keyboard into it so I can go full-on Encom/Tron it would be even better.
People get tired of USB being affordable and pine for a more Firewire-type system?
Why are we hoping for authenticated cables?
"Safety is a big concern for Tesla so they've manufactured the Model 3 with a 5 star safety rating in every category."
They haven't manufactured it at all yet. And they hope to get a 5 star rating. They don't award the starts themselves, so they'll have to do their best and wait and see what happens like anyone else.
Printable instant tickets can work.
But the foolish design thing here was having the machine know the outcome of the ticket before it prints (or even at all). A printable instant ticket should just consist of a random number which can be checked elsewhere to see if it won. Much like a lotto ticket.
The machine doesn't know which ones are winners so it can't decide to print only winners.
There will still be a "refund errant ticket" attack as long as there is a refund system for errantly printed tickets. But honestly, I don't see why you need a system of that sort in a system where you don't get to pick your numbers anyway.
C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas l'Informatique. -- Bosquet [on seeing the IBM 4341]