A million monkeys with typewriters will never be able to reproduce
Hamlet. The reason for this is very simple: They are million monkeys with typewriters, not [a] Shakespeare with [a] quill.
Now, I'm sure that Shakespeare would have produced Hamlet even if he had used a tpyewriter instead of a quill. Would it have turned out the same, I'm not so sure of (for Marshall McLuhan or someone else believing in the mantra The Medium is the Message, the answer would be a definite "No").
Which one is more important then, the Shakespeare or the quill? Yeah, it's a rhetorical question, one that I don't even need to answer myself (I hope). Yet, there is still something about the instrument, the medium used for writing that makes a difference -- if not for the writer, then for the reader.
Let's take electronic mail, for example (for the purpose of this JE, let JEs and comments also count as electronic mail). While I, or someone else, will put the same effort into writing an email as writing a letter on paper, there's still some things that email lacks. First off, there's no handwriting. The writing style may be the same, but the shape of the words is...different (at the same time, it's always the same -- due to standard fonts used).
Then there's the things you can't do with an electronic "letter". You can read it over and over, but there will never be a mark on the letter of you reading it. The letters (err, characters) never wear off. As memory, it is perfect, as it never forgets anything. But such a perfect memory is also quite useless, as it creates nothing new. No information about the reader.
An illustration:
To resume: The long, typewritten, four-year-old letter that Zooey had checked into the bathtub with, on this Monday morning in November, 1955, had obviously been taken out of its envelope and unfolded and refolded on too many private occasions during the four years, so that now it not only had an over-all unappetitlich appearance but was actually torn in several places, mostly along the creases. [...]
Curiously enough, the same description more or less also applies to the book this passage is taken from. The edges of the covers are torn and tattered. The corners of the pages have been worn round; some of them also dyed orange by a leaking text marker. But the pages still smell of incense -- just like they did four years ago when I picked this book up in a small bookstore.
This small book is as second-hand as a book can be. It seems to have had at least three owners before me: someone bought it new sometime round 1970, but then sold it/gave it away. Then someone called Peggy bought it (second-hand), and sent it to a Finn called Terjo (it's a guy's name if I'm not mistaken). After that, the book somehow wound up in this small bookstore in Estonia, and I find it very unlikely that this Finnish guy had brought it there. All these people, that little book "remembers" -- and it doesn't even matter to me if these "memories" are false.
Call me old-fashioned, but I like dead trees.