Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Military

Submission + - Predator Unmanned Aircraft Causing Data Overload

Hugh Pickens writes: "The Washington Post reports that the flow of data from Predator unmanned aircraft flying combat patrols over Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere not only exceeds capabilities to interpret and exploit the data, but probably soon will exceed the bandwidth available to carry it to ground stations. "According to US Central Command officials, the command exploits less than one-half of the electronic-signal intercepts collected from the Predator," says Davi M. D'Agostino, GAO's director of defense capabilities and management, adding that information collected by wide-area sensors is saved on computer disks and flown back to the United States for review and dissemination "because current networks in the theater of operations cannot handle the large amount of data." Another problem is the failure by the services to develop common electronic systems so they can share Predator data (PDF). The full-motion videos gathered daily by the Army cannot be automatically shared with the Air Force and the Army's common sharing system for collections by its unique systems, such as Shadow and its version of the Predator, is not expected to be available to others until 2016. Although these aircraft have "enormous capability and concept advantages," they "are not a panacea for air warfare nor replacement for manned aviation," says Lt. Gen. David Deptula, the Air Force's deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance."

Comment Re:Awful ports? (Score 1) 398

Sound advice, but thumb drives and such don't provide the extra insight of "cable bend". Further, the problem isn't usually knowing which way up the cable should be, it's "which orientation did the manufacturer decide to put this particular set of ports in" - and that's rarely ever marked.

What we need is self-plugging devices... then I'll stop complaining I promise!

Comment Re:Awful ports? (Score 5, Insightful) 398

Yes! Why on earth does it work like that? I try to plug a USB cable in, but it doesn't feel like it wants to go, so I invert it, and it still won't go. Then I frown and look down the end of the cable, decide once more upon the proper orientation, and whoosh, it fits.

Truly an engineering masterpiece.
Data Storage

Submission + - InPhase Holographic storage finally dead

The Bender writes: It appears that the eternally "few years away" holographic storage developer InPhase Technologies has finally curled up and died, culminating a couple of years of gradual decline and questionable activities in its attempts to stay solvent. The company was spun out of Lucent 10 years ago on a wave of promise in new optical data storage technologies, almost all of which have quietly rolled over, and dutifully worked its way through well over $100M of investment. We have discussed them and their promises of TB-capacity removable discs many times before, but it looks like this could be the last one.

Submission + - Should German lawyers be able to tell UK media wha (hexus.net)

unts writes: Recently a German mini-notebook manufacturer took exception to Qualcomm's use of the term "smartbook" to refer to ARM powered mini-notebooks. Smartbook AG set about a legal campaign against Qualcomm and has obtained a temporary restraining order in Germany. But the firm hasn't stopped there, seeking to litigate against any media outlet that dare use the word "smartbook" when referring to ARM based notebooks. HEXUS recently fell foul of such a lawyer's letter, but isn't keeping quiet about it:

[...]why has Smartbook AG sent us this letter? Surely they can see that the genie is already out of the bottle. Furthermore, it hasn't even registered the trademark in the US, China, or countless other countries so what does it expect to achieve by threatening a few European journalists? Also, we can't find any evidence of Smartbook AG selling its products outside of Germany. How can it register a trademark in countries where it has no presence? Our feeling is that it's an indirect way of pressuring Qualcomm into settling the matter out of court and buying the trademark for as high a price as possible.

Qualcomm is disputing the restraining order in Germany, and Smartbook AG has stated its desire to sell the trademark.

Microsoft

Submission + - LCA2010: MS software patents piss off Samba dev (computerworld.com.au)

An anonymous reader writes: In one of the funniest presentations so far at Linux.conf.au being held in Wellington, one of the Samba team's lead developers said Microsoft's attempts to generate revenue out of linux vendors through pursuing patent suits really pisses him off.

Computerworld quotes Jeremy Allison as saying: "you see this especially in the appliance market where Microsoft will go to a company — off the record as this is never ever done in public — and say 'this product you have there, shame if someone brought a patent suit. So you have two options you can re-architect — here is Windows — or the other thing is why don't you give us a cut on all the free software you are using?'. It is an attempt to create the work that we do, into a Microsoft revenue stream. I don't know about you but that really pisses me off."

The article provides a pretty good write up of the hour-long presentation that covered off on recent examples of why MS is a threat to open source

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/333351/illuminating_elephant_open_source_room/?fp=16&fpid=1

Encryption

Submission + - 768-bit RSA encryption has been cracked (siliconrepublic.com)

jaq1an writes: SilconRepublic is reporting that 768-bit RSA encryption has been cracked using a cluster PC approach. Quote from article "Whilst this crypto cracking feat is impressive, it highlights the fact that the days of relying on encryption alone as a means of defending private data are now drawing to a close."

Is nothing safe anymore?

Google

Submission + - Google Launches Public DNS Resolver (blogspot.com)

AdmiralXyz writes: Google has announced the launch of their free DNS resolution service, called Google Public DNS. According to their blog post, Google Public DNS uses continuous record prefetching to avoid cache misses- hopefully making the service faster- and implements a variety of techniques to block spoofing attempts. They also say that (unlike an increasing number of ISPs), Google Public DNS behaves exactly according to the DNS standard, and will not redirect you to advertising in the event of a failed lookup. Very cool, but of course there are questions about Google's true motivations behind knowing every site you visit...

Slashdot Top Deals

Overload -- core meltdown sequence initiated.

Working...