Perhaps so; those people can read at -1. Maybe, however, they could also attract people who are interested in "measured, reasonable and informative discussion of a difficult subject" who would read at +3,4, or 5.

That would be an improvement, without reducing the sensationalist crap that is their bread and butter.

This appears to be design by committee; we all know where that leads.

If they spread the waste out over a larger area, then the pile wouldn't be growing higher!

(At least for now.)

Don't forget nutmeat.

I would be curious to see the algorithm for determining the appropriate default of each location which shares a name with another location.

I doubt it. Fill in the blanks:

A ____ and his _____ are soon parted.

Mor like panic!

Well, it explains why their code is described as buggy!

I think they named it after the Linux distribution.

"We donâ(TM)t care. We donâ(TM)t have to. Weâ(TM)re Disney."

(with apologies to Ernestine)

So: not great food; badly delivered.

Fuck you both with a pineapple, Brian Schatz and Republican John Thune.

So, what are the chances that the "tough on crime" groups will add pollution control to their platforms?

This is the stupidest comment I've read in along time.

You lose the InterWebs today!

"Drink your Ovaltine".