That doesn't mean anything: humans have killed millions of humans too, and there is no evidence that humans have adapted their communication in any way to deal with the problem either.
And a lot of the sounds humans make is also about mating.
"Hey Mike, look up: the fucking monkeys are circling overhead in their fucking boats again."
"Uh oh... Better dive deep in case they came with their spikey things again"
You know why? Because I block ads.
The brain starts with the semantics. Some are innate, others are learned, but the semantics is always first. The syntax is then layered on top of this. This is why the high-intelligence end of the autistic spectrum is linked to delayed speech followed by a very rapid process to complex speech. The semantics is being built to a far higher degree, the syntax is postponed until the last possible moment.
AI, as it currently exists, needs a very very large number of examples, far more than the brain by tens of orders of magnitude, and hallucinates far more, because ALL it knows is the syntax. There is no handling of the semantics at all.
This approach can NEVER lead to actual intelligence of any sort, let alone superintelligence. They are solving the wrong problem. And that is why they fail, and why they will only ever fail.
If you want actual intelligence, the syntax must come LAST. And the modern breed of AI researcher is simply far too stubborn and arrogant to fathom that.
The next one won't make anybody laugh.
Since communism is, by definition, classless, you cannot both be classist and communist.
Racism is, again by definition, incompatible with abstraction.
My conclusion is that you're pretty shaky on definitions.
They would remove Copilot from Github. AI that codes is as irresponsible as it gets.
The original margarine is a better example where "those who know better" made a "heart-healthy" replacement for cow-based butter. Turns out making it out of trans-fats made it far more dangerous than butter.
They'd disclosed it but the first one hadn't finished testifying under oath about it. And that matters. The latter has status as evidence in court.
You're right: the cloud isn't going away.
What should go away is for-hire cloud services from monopolistic and abusive vendors. My hope is that people will eventually be able to deploy and manage their own clouds without paying a fortune to, or having your data pilfered by Big Data giants, thereby giving the Microsofts, Amazons and other Googles the middle finger they so richly deserve.
Maybe, just maybe, just like in the 80s when the personal computer finally broke the mainframe monopolies and freed us from insufferable BOFHs on power trips and insane pricings, someone or something will come along to break the cloud monopolies.
And then we'll be free again, until the next bunch of suckers lets history repeat itself once more. But I'll be long dead by then.
Because if they're explaining to non-scientists, they might as well be explaining to babies. The foundational knowledge taught in schools simply isn't up to the standard needed.
Function reject.
