Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Why workers aren't going back to work (Score 2) 248

You don't have to read the whole article to understand the problem, just this one paragraph:

A year later, Targos said she’s found it tough caring for three toddlers even with the help of her husband and a nanny, but she relishes that she’s always nearby when her babies need her. With President Biden calling for federal workers to return to offices this fall, she may soon have to brave a two-hour commute through Chicago rush hour and rework her child-care plan — or consider a more drastic change.

Today's American families want to have everything: a house in the suburbs, two cars in the garage, children, and well-paying jobs to afford it all. But today in 2023, it's practically impossible to have all of this. Suburban homes are too expensive. Cars are too expensive. Children are expensive. And jobs (that pay enough) are too far a drive away from suburbia. Typically, the only way to make this all work is with daycare. But daycare is expensive, and there's more demand than there is supply.

(Not to mention the fact that the economics of daycare are practically impossible in America. When I was a child, daycare was neighborhood mothers grouping together and organizing a schedule to watch each others kids. Today's daycare is an organized service that either has to be so expensive that it's unaffordable to middle-class America, or that the workers don't get paid enough money to also live middle class lifestyles. Not to mention that one mistake in handling how you care for a child can lead to the state shutting the whole place down.)

But if one can work from home, that lets you have your job and get paid for it too. And you can watch your kids. Which makes that $500,000 home in the suburbs just a little bit more affordable.

Honestly, I don't think we'd be having this conversation if homes and cars weren't so damn expensive.

Comment Spoiler alert (Score 4, Informative) 46

It's already been done.

And I actually used one once. I hated it. I can type a sustained 100+ wpm, but with this thing, I barely breached 20. Granted, it was buggy as hell, but even if it had worked flawlessly, I have no tactile feedback at my fingertips to confirm that I'm pressing on a key, which slowed me down. More importantly, there was absolutely no tactile reference point to anchor my fingers (unlike the raised dimples on the 'f' and 'j' keys), so my fingers would drift off the keys if I didn't keep a constant look at them, which also slowed me down terribly.

No way these guys were getting over 100 wpm.

Death to Meta. What a waste of money.

Comment All vehicles are killing the spare tire (Score 4, Insightful) 314

When I last shopped for a car 5 years ago, many didn't have a spare, just the fix-a-flat spray can. I suppose not having the 50-80 pounds saves a few gallons a year. But at the rate car prices keep climbing, I doubt cost has much to do with it.

Personally, I am more frustrated how electric cars are killing electric cars. The batteries are way too big and way too heavy (not to mention way too expensive) and are wasting too much energy moving itself around. I would like a small battery that has enough juice for commuting, and I wish Detroit would make a good quality, light weight and range commuter electric vehicle, not these monstrous monstrocities like the Ford f150 Lightning. Until then, I think I'll settle for a plug-in hybrid.

Comment It goes both ways (Score 2) 175

The requirement that ISPs list all their monthly fees "would add unnecessary complexity and burdens to the label for consumers and providers and could result in some providers having to create many labels for any given plan,"

As a consumer, paying monthly fees adds an unnecessary complexity and burden to the amount of labor I need to work to afford the fees. Let's lobby the FCC to let consumers stop paying the fees altogether.

Fuck Big Internet. They take our money from what we pay for service, they take more of our money from what we pay in fees, and then they take the rest of our money from the taxes we pay to Uncle Sam. In return, they give us the worst customer service that can barely qualifies to meet the definition of the words "customer service." Not a single executive from any of those companies earns less than a million dollars a year. To hell with all of them.

Comment Who cares about AI? (Score 2, Insightful) 463

That followed his saying earlier this month that he anticipates an electricity shortage in two years that could stunt the energy-hungry development of artificial intelligence.

Will AI improve the welfare of our planet and its inhabitants? No. Will electric vehicles? Maybe. But given the stakes, a maybe is worth pursuing.

Frankly, I haven't seen anything yet that AI has done that has truly been a benefit for human kind. I only see vain capitalistic pursuits.

Comment How ignorant (Score 5, Informative) 142

You should be asking, "What could go right?" Because this country has had a long history of new industries getting so big and powerful that they choose profits over the health and welfare of the people, and the only thing that put a stop to it was the federal government.

Do you remember the days when it was common practice to shovel whatever scraps were found on the meat packing floor into the meat grinder, including dead rats, their droppings, and the occasional human finger? Do you remember the days where anyone could shove anything into a bottle, including mercury, lead, and heroin, call it "medicine", and sell it to the sick and poor? Do you remember the days when a family could order their seven year old son to go work in the coal mine, because daddy needed drinking money?

No? That's right, and neither do I, because all those atrocities were stopped long ago thanks to government regulation.

So today, do you like the fact that you and your children each have a data profile created by Big Data that can be sold in the digital marketplace without your consent? Do you like the fact that Big Data can hand over surveillance of you and your property to government authorities without your consent? Do you like the fact that that Big Data can create algorithms and neural networks that propagate lies that cause humans to kill one another, with you a potential victim, without being held responsibility for these atrocities? Do you like the fact that, once a Big Data company seizes control of the marketplace, they can reign as a monopoly without any government controls and actions that keep their power in check?

If not, then you should hope government regulation can put a stop to it.

Comment I sure as hell hope not (Score 2) 65

More likely it is an effort to make it a public health issue that the government will then declare is an environmental disaster and make it an EPA superfund issue, allowing the telecos to get paid taxpayer money to upgrade those lines to fiber instead of having to pay for it themselves.

Here's what I'd like to see instead: Make it a requirement that any of the telcos that are responsible for these lead-lined cables be ineligible to receive the $40 billion in broadband funding until those cables are removed.

Comment Re:Apple's connectors are actually a good idea... (Score 4, Informative) 283

Speaking as a K-12 tech director that sees these cables and ports get destroyed year-in, year-out, I'll say this:

Every year, with a fleet of about 1,200 Chromebooks that use USB-C charging, I have about 5-7 USB-C receptacle ports that get broken off each year due to the flexing problems Excelcia mentioned. But in all the six years that we've had Lightning connectors on our iPads, we've had 0 broken receptacle ports.

I throw 30-40 cables every year due to damages, both types. They're equally weak. But the USB-C receptacles are definitely weak and more easily broken than they should be. And when they break, it's near-impossible to repair them.

Comment How frustrating (Score 5, Insightful) 125

Just like Franklin Delano Roosevelt delivered electricity to every home in America through his Rural Electrification Act...

Make no mistake, this bill is NOT the equivalent of the Rural Electrification Act. That bill provided loans to electric cooperatives across rural America, many which still operate today. This bill provides subsidies to private corporations (via the states).

Corporate America is winning the battle against municipal & and cooperative broadband, and they're using this bill to help do it.

Comment Begs the question... (Score 2) 62

Customers of Venmo, PayPal and CashApp should not store their money with those apps for the long term because the funds might not be safe during a crisis, the [U.S.] Consumer Financial Protection Bureau warned Thursday.

These apps have been doing direct payment processing for years, so why is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau warning us now? The timing of this, as well as the specificity of mentioning "a crisis", seriously makes me think the US Government expects another financial collapse is imminent.

But as long as no major financial CEOs are dumping stock, we shouldn't be too worried, right? Oh wait...

Comment Now there's the moral of the story! (Score 4, Insightful) 193

The article notes that one copywriter lost all 10 of his clients over the last four months...he's now training to be a plumber.

That's what I'm telling students in school. Become a plumber, electrician, or nurse. Because if there's anything I trust AI will never be able to accomplish, it's unclogging your toilet, wiring your house, and changing your bedpan.

Comment Delusions of Grandeur (Score 1) 225

AI weapons will be superior to humans...AI will be better at target selection...AI will follow the rules of engagement...AI will not suffer confusion...AI will be configurable...

What planet do you live on? Because, here on Earth, AI can't even make out soldiers hiding in a cardboard box. You're delusional if you think it's going to be better than humans at warfare.

Slashdot Top Deals

Single tasking: Just Say No.

Working...