Fustacrackitch makes a good point: the Left/Right "dichotomy" is content-free.
Commonplace, but not meaningful. Fusty, as usual, grouses without offering alternatives, except, perhaps, ignoring the no-kidding questions besetting society.
"The sun also rises," he seems to say, in his hemming and hawing way. (SWIDT?)
The very real divide in the discussion, AFAICT, is due to having reverted to a quasi-aristocracy. By which I mean a ruling clique of oligarchs and career bureaucrats.
You can say "Deep State" if there is an interest in trolling, but it's more a function of organizational behavior. Conspiratorial efforts are mostly implicit. The players all went to the same schools, snorted the same Marxist DranO, and think that they are ushering in some sort of "worker's paradise".
The Socialist mantra, pushed by these people, then, is some argument about the plural preceding the singular, individual, sovereign citizen.
It is a tyranny of the majority controlled by a minority vanguard. Since Socialism argues that the many precede the indicviduals, I will henceforth call this the "Pluralist" view. Those adhereing to Natural Law notions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness will be called "Singularist". It must be stated that a radical individuality is putting too fine a point on my view. The human default is:
1. Life at conception, when the genetic information is complete. There is no magic in general, and especially _no_ magical post-conception moment when life, as such, is attained. It is a diabolical lie from the pit to claim otherwise, irrespective of whatever sophistries and credentials are piled onto the falsehoods to make them sound pleasant.
2. Birth with an immutable gender. Various errors, affectations, and illness may run rampant in society, but gender the idea that gender is a social construct is another diabolical lie from the pit. As Timcast points out, there is a
trans genocide. It is pushed by these Pluralists normalizing falsehood, and sterilizing Gen Z. Only the Devil would claim to be helping someone with a knee problem by amputating a leg, but that sort of thing is what is miscalled "care" in our twisted day.
3. Form follows function. One is quite aware that other geometries are possible, but the unspeakable is better left unspoken. Because the future belongs to those who show up. And they show up by having families. Families are properly formed by an XXXY chromosome set. There are no legitimate alternatives, just a pack of lies, however transiently pleasant.
4. Tolerance of folly is not wisdom. Nor are accusations interesting. An alternative argument starting with absolute truth and refuting any of 1-3 is of interest. Change my mind.
To summarize, when I say "Singularist", I really mean that the preferred (though obviously not sole) base unit of society is the family. When I say "Pluralist", I mean those forces bent on replacing what is good with some ersatz, unsustainable garbage. Fusty's chief power seems to be dissatisfaction, so this post (a) will not meet whatever standard he may have, and (b) will not be met with any alternatives. But one tries, nonetheless.