they get what they deserve, really, outlook is the real problem.

author condemns itself instantly.

_only_ in amerika is it called a period.

bloody yanks.

however, as far as i can tell, the reason behind all this yankee posturing over huawei is because their products interfere with the benighted states world wide roll out of it's own spy hardware.

i arrive at this prejudice by watching who makes the most noise - the lady doth protest too much, methinks.

in the video, i see display ram, but i did not hear or notice anything about core/process storage.

always wanted to do something like this myself - bravo, bis, encore.

would second this if only to get more of the above to watch.

however i do not think may and his lot would have the chops for this.

it doesn't actually move - and may is not that slow.

your loss..

i've been wondering what they were actually for.

stupid wankers.

dear tfa - did you do that deliberately?

we (mostly) all know and understand the old latinate legalese in re pro and con, but we all also know that the meanings of the word "con" has changed, in current use, and are no longer "polite".

therefore, dear author, pray tell - was that a deliberate con there?

it all works for me - robots would not normally, i assume, procreate, so this should help to reduce the glut of humaninanity..

and i see this as being on the path toward the point where money/property/power etc become immaterial..

and we all must understand the real meaning of wealth itself.

an AI in charge of one of them squashed beetles could cause..

they're bad enough when driven by a human.

or, as i prefer to call you, metal beetle people - car drivers are an abortion of history, they're not "human" in the real sense of the word.

this one, on a t-shirt.
thank you.