Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Remdesivir also failed. (Score 1) 264

Ventilators have a 90% failure rate.

No they didn't. It was an error in calculation, they calculated deaths/(deaths + discharged) in the first weeks of ventilation usage, giving the 90% number. About half the people who die on ventilation from COVID-19 die in the first week; but those who recover and are discharged often take a month to a month and a half. So at the point they did the estimate almost noone was recovered and discharged, but half of the deaths that were going to occur hand already occurred. The team has since updated their preprint and it is an 75-80% survival rate, exactly what was expected from the experience of China and Italy.

Comment Re:Proper science = politicised? (Score 4, Informative) 37

Their junk code and methodology were only reviewed after they massively impacted the world. At best that was scientific malpractice.

There code is fairly typical academic code. Better than lots of such code I've seen. From a quick review of their bug tracker and patch tracker, the bugs weren't such that they would have significant impact on the results. The complaints about bugs and code quality were false distractions.

As one person who has reviewed the code put it

To be honest I've seen much less maintainable code at blue chips.

Feel free to review the code yourself.

https://github.com/mrc-ide/cov...

I also asked in the bug tracker if anyone is aware of any bugs that could have significantly impacted their results, and the answer is no. The output after various refactorings and bug fixes is stochastically the same (previous versions were non deterministic, so could give slightly different results, etc.)

https://github.com/mrc-ide/cov...

Comment R 1 is not 'uncontrolled' (Score 1, Insightful) 197

An R > 1 simply means that each infected person is spreading it to more than one person, and thus the number of infections with each generation is growing.

An R == 1 means that each person infects on average one person, and the number of infections per generation is constant.

An R 2 - which is the R when action isn't taken to curb it. So in reality it is probably being 'controlled' to some extent, just not sufficiently to cause the long term trend to be shrinking or constant rather than growing.

Comment two airplanes and a weather balloon (Score 4, Interesting) 142

I hate to spoil a good conspiracy theory with facts, but the videos have been analysed using basic observation skills and mathematics - and these are likely two airplanes and a weather balloon.

You can watch the analysis and explanations on these videos,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Comment Re:Still useless (Score 1) 64

The criticism of the above is that their sample population was not randomized enough given they recruited through FB. I didn't rtfp to judge for myself. Even if you take that part with a big grain of salt and presume their antibody test had some proportion of false positives, it would reveal a very large multiplier of the 'official' numbers of covid positive folks to get the true population.

They other major issue is that 30 people to establish the specificity may be too small if there is cross reactivity with other coronaviruses. They are claiming a specificity of 99.5-100%. The only FDA approved COVID-19 test has a specificity of 95.4% or so. I suspect that their specificity is way off and so almost all of their result is false positives.

Comment Re:Coming soon (Score 2) 247

There is plenty of proof. Western governments just chose to ignore it for months when it really would have made a difference.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

To quote from this study: "vaccination during the influenza season (OR 0.866, 95% CI 0.786â"0.954) and wearing a mask (OR 0.859, 95% CI 0.778â"0.949) showed significant protective association. In contrast, hand washing was not associated with protection (OR 1.447, 95% CI 1.274â"1.644)"

That study was on school children. School children are in a confined space with lots of talking, and few opportunities to wash hands, with frequent handling of things touched by other children. Thus is that scenario we'd expect hand washing to be useless and masks to be effective.

The scenario masks are being required for are brief contact with strangers. It is a completely different situation - there is generally little or no talking; touching of items touched by strangers be be minimized, and washing of hands can occur within a reasonable time period.

Submission + - FAA proposes drone rules that would make drones cost hundereds of dollars (arstechnica.com)

LetterRip writes: The FAA is proposing to require that every drone be equipped with wireless internet capability and continuously update its location to an internet database during flight. This will presumably cost 20=50$ per month for the connectivity, and add significant weight to each drone. A much cheaper and lighter alternative not being considered by the FAA is to have a transponder for each drone that broadcasts a unique ID. Comments can be submitted till Monday.

Comment Depends on the content ... (Score 1) 82

I can listen to 'lecture' type content at close to 3x (2.7x) comfortably for many speakers - largely because many lecturers speak at a ponderous rate and are extremely redundant.

However for entertainment (film and TV DVDs, BluRays) - I can comfortably watch at around 1.7x-2x depending on content - probably due to the need to process emotional cues, etc.

Comment The jury decided based on "Acquaintance" (Score 5, Interesting) 101

The jury had 5 parts that were to be satisfied for a finding of defamation.

"Acquaintance" - meaning that the readers of Elon's tweets knew who the target of the tweet was.

The jury agreed that the tweet didn't say Unsworth's name, and no other evidence was provided that readers of the tweet associated the tweet with the person claiming to be defamed, and thus acquaintance wasn't established. Therefore it couldn't be legally established that defamation occurred.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/a...

Comment Old NVidia Chips (Score 3, Informative) 69

The single biggest problem with linux on older computers/laptops is that NVidia no longer supports their older GPUs and the open source drivers don't really support the older cards either (both the framebuffer driver in grub, and the driver in the kernel)

So there are huge problems with both setting up the machine and with usability unless you are using an 8-10 year out of date distro.

Comment Re:Don't worry guise... (Score 1, Insightful) 87

I wouldn't be too worried about this "theft." That source code is a huge trojan horse anyway, if I ever seen one. How many times has Tesla autopilot caused crashes, deaths, and mayhem so far?

Autopilot is a different code base from the self-driving. Autopilot is a lane keeping and adaptive cruise control that doesn't have anything to do with their self-driving code.

Comment Re:Shit happens, things change. (Score 2) 236

Aye, it may be impossible the way Tesla is trying to do it. Their original plan was for a coast-to-coast demo in 2017, which obviously failed.

What "failed" is that they had to start over from scratch because MobileEye felt that it should own all of the self driving data, and Tesla disagreed. So it took a few years to get back to their 2016 status.

They actually could do a coast to coast demo now and have had that capability for about a year. Their current difficulties are the same that Waymo is having - you have to trust that other drivers will actually obey red lights and stop signs - thus ignoring that the other drivers current velocity will cause a crash if they don't slow down or stop when you make a left turn. Similarly aggressive behavior required for merging, etc. that will cause an accident if the other driver ignores you trying to merge, etc.

Their problem is twofold. First they underestimated the processing power needed to do handle images from the cameras. They use neural nets to process them and on the original hardware they shipped (known as AP2) it just wasn't powerful enough, they couldn't even get it to compare consecutive images (which helps when you don't have stereo vision). They went to AP2.5 and now AP3, but it's not clear if even that is fast enough for what they want to do.

You should watch youtube videos that show the shadowmode debugging output that is tracking people, cars, bikes, road markings (lane boundaries, stop at light boundaries) etc. in real time for all cameras. The hardware works fine for what it needs to do.

The second problem is that it's just really, really hard to use neural nets to do everything they need. Not just recognizing objects like cars, signs and traffic lights. It has to see road markings, it has to see traffic police and understand their gestures, it has to understand complex 3D spaces with no/poor road markings like car parks and private driveways. It has to be able to recognize small objects that the radar/ultrasonics close to the ground won't pick up, like toll barriers and the over-hanging rear ends of trucks.

It isn't as hard as you seem to think, also they aren't using NN's for everything. Also FSD doesn't have to handle every case - you can geofence it - so it never has to handle private driveways. Something that is level 5 for well defined common use cases, but doesn't do country rounds in the middle of nowhere is still a major game changer; or that announces that "in 10 minutes we will be approaching the boundary for FSD, please take over soon".

To give you some idea of how far away they are, even the current driver assist parking isn't good enough for full self driving.

The driver assist is an entirely different code base. It is using essentially none of the data that is being used for FSD development. They are parallel development tracks with almost no resources being devoted to the non FSD stuff.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never trust a computer you can't repair yourself.

Working...