Im intrigued. Did co2 cause this event as well?


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/26/co2-ice-cores-vs-plant-stomata/

perfect timing!

One of their cult members stumbles in reciting Hansens latest edicts just to prove my point.

down-twinkles hkmwbz, down-twinkles. Being brainwashed is not cool!

Touche! Thinkprogess.com Hard to top a crew that thinks the IPCC is the "Council of Nicaea" producing our articles of faith that shall not be challenged or questioned."

So, what skeptic data have you read that "disagrees with your conclusion"?

we are past the point of the last Irreversible claim... and the one before that... and the one before that...

sheesh. The classic William Lane Craig vs Antony Flew debate settled this a long time ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NixhL0CoH2s

perhaps i shouldn't assume your one of those warmist religious freaks.

If you are, the irony of these two agreeing that warming has stopped, you cant conclude shit from the land surface data and the ipcc has problems is priceless. Thanks for pointing that out.

If your not, well. Welcome to the club i guess. Now move along and argue with someone else. cheerio.

lmfao.

"Re the recent trend, Muller reiterated that you can’t infer anything about what is going on globally from the land data, but the land data shows a continued increase albeit with an oscillation that makes determining a trend rather ambiguous. He thinks there is a pause, that is probably associated with AMO/PDO. So I am ok with this interpretation."

" We also discussed problems with the IPCC, Climategate issues, etc., and we tend to mostly agree on all this. "

Did you even read it or was it too much information for you?

Such a weak strawman. No wonder you had to post as Anonymous Coward...
The real news of this story is that the co author slammed him, accused him of hiding data and put forth more data that shows you are basically full of shit.

Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2055191/Scientists-said-climate-change-sceptics-proved-wrong-accused-hiding-truth-colleague.html

how smug of you. 2 sec google work hit this http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/08/the-surfacestations-org-paper-accepted/

Being that you are the arbiter of who qualifies as a scientist, perhaps you would like to share your qualifications to such. Any published peer-reviewed scientific work to back yourself up?

you must be right because you said so.
He is an American meteorologist, AMS holder and conducts scientific analysis of weather stations. What does that blogger know about weather and climate. To be a real climate scientist you must be in bed with WWF, some other offshoot or labeled one by Al Gore. Everyone knows that!