I was unable to locate the video in question, so I assume it's been taken down, and, sadly, and somewhat surprisingly, appears not to have been reuploaded.

As far as I know, "ax" is acceptable in American English, British English only permits "axe". I noticed TFA's inability to spell "hassled" in the headline far more. On an unrelated note, I wonder whether they would have pressed charges were the employee in question to have disclosed the vulnerabilities only to the TSA. It's been done in the context of comp security, so I wouldn't be surprised at all to see it happen to someone reporting on physical security.

No, I don't believe that BoA has a support sty to rant in, at or with, whatever a support sty may be.

Zork's well-known enough not to require an introduction such as "an addictive role-playing text adventure called Zork", surely. I think that you may be a candidate for being eaten by a grue. On a more related and less hair-splitting note, MAME is infinitely better than any flash port when it comes to arcade classics, and just as legal. I can't see how an unofficial flash port is any more legal than an unofficial emulation.

There's astounding variety in dyslogistics; humanity's capacity to insult extends far beyond the simple "x sucks", "y blows", and often enters far more explicit territory. What makes them think that "sucks" and "blows" are the preferred verbal weapon of the domain-registering masses? If anything, this will only cause a rise in popularity of other insulting verbs.

I agree with most of these; however, I'd revise #3 to refer to "a substantial API" and not the minimal, in terms of usefulness execrable, deposits of code provided by some software.