The other problem with listening to the players is that it dilutes any strong vision the devs may have originally had.
Your strong vision means jack shit if none of the players like it and stop playing your game.
Yeah, people are SO going to purchase content that can be revoked on a whim.
You mean like how no one uses the iTunes store or Steam?
If Theora can get within the ballpark in terms of quality, but beat H.264 in speed, that could be the edge it needs to hit the mainstream.
Except that a good number of the big industry players have their hands some how involved in the patent pool of H.264. If you think they are going to ditch H.264 for some no-name free codec then you are living in a dream world. http://www.mpegla.com/avc/avc-licensors.cfm
Why should I pay for your internet connection, or your car, or your house.
I didn't say you should. I have to wonder if you even read my post. Here I will post it again:
Then they don't have to buy the service. It can be run like that Greenlight, Inc company that is entirely funded through it's subscriptions and not by cross-subsidizing.
Notice how I specifically said it shouldn't be cross-subsidized (paid for by other parts of the government's budget) and it should be supported only through customer subscriptions. Which in turn means that it should only be run in the case of it being able to be a self-supporting business. So in light of what I actually said, I'm not sure what you are railing against in my post as I never once stated that anyone should have to pay for anyone else's internet service. I also have no clue from what orifice that you pulled out the nonsense where you try to claim that I was saying someone should pay for my (or anyone else's) house and car.
No. there was a predecesseor to Vista that never made it out the door. it too was called longhorn.
Sorry, but no. Longhorn was always the just the codename for the early versions of Vista prior to it being rebranded Vista in 2005.
Since QT 4.5 is not LGPL...how about re-creating its interface using QT like folks at VideoLan did. This would go a great way in improving the user experience.
Welcome to last year. http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2008/08/nokia-helps-port-firefox-to-qt.ars
I'm not so sure about that any more.
Then you haven't apparently been following much of the aftermath of UAC because most users are apparently just clicking allow blindly without caring.
Radio stations are in the MHz range, going from 100 MHz to 2.4 GHz is a 24 fold jump, going from 2.4 GHz to 60 GHz is about the same (25 fold)
And visible light starts at around 660 THz which is a 275000 fold jump from 2.4 GHz. Oh my god we better start panicking!
It is your destiny. - Darth Vader