If you can't get rid of the predators, at least help the predators select out their taste for Kakapo
BTW, the link will take you to a website where you will be asked if you want to see the patent, and if you click yes, you'll go to a page that lists several patents (along with lots of ads), and if you choose the right link, you might get to see the patent. Good luck.
Now, it's true that the resolution only impacted the Senate -- but when another Senator asked why they didn't ban dial phones from all of Washington DC, Senator Carter Glass from Virginia who sponsored the resolution apparently said that "he hoped the phone company would take the hint," and would remove all dial phones.
Do you want your local supermarket to "get the hint" and stop selling toilet paper?
Just because they didn't want to lift a finger to do something as simple as dial a telephone, that doesn't mean they need to ban it for the rest of us. The Senate is FAMOUS for passing laws that affect them (or affect everyone except them - you know, we get Social Security, they get a really sweet pension).
If they deem a website to be "bad", I have no problem with them blocking it from their own servers, but leave me alone. I can block things at my router quite easily, thank you. Should I be afraid that the Senate will try to ban toilet paper, because they can't manage to wipe their own asses?
Yeah, I get it. Popcorn in the Sea of tranquility, Re-heated Pizza in the Ocean of Storms, and a nice cup of tea in the Messier crater. Microwave map of the moon, indeed!
Hmmm, the link looks like it has been slashdotted, but since it says "archives," it might not even be the right one. Maybe they meant this one?
As inspiring as the STS program was, it's time to move on. Thinking about a craft that weighs several thousand tons being used to move crew and cargo into space on the same ride just doesn't make sense. We can send an unmanned cargo ship into orbit quite easily, without needing all of the protection that a "human cargo" would require. Having a tiny Orion spacecraft bring the people makes a lot more sense.
How did we get into the "combined crew & cargo" paradigm? Perhaps it was because of the difficulty in providing unmanned vessels that made it to the specified destination, or perhaps it was because the Gemini and Apollo astronauts really hated being compared to the "chimp in a suit" and forced NASA's to put people on every ship.
I'll just be glad when I see something smaller than a double-wide mobile home being used to ferry the humans into space.
If that's spam, fine. I thought it was a worhtwhile announcement, so I brought it to
It seems as though Crunchgear Ubergizmo, Engadget and other sites thought it was worth mentioning.
I have no financial interest in Peek, other than the $10/month I send to them for my service
In related news, I just opened "Space Coast Window Repair."
Sorry, but 10x roller coaster speeds isn't close to Mach 10.
NASA is on to something interesting here. It would seem that MagLev is required (no wheels can handle that speed), and it would be interesting to see what kind of acceleration they can get out of LIM's. Rocket propulsion seems a waste in this application. It might help bullet-train technology, and we can get some new spin-off inventions from NASA.
"No job too big; no fee too big!" -- Dr. Peter Venkman, "Ghost-busters"