Co$ wouldn't have to lawyer up, they aren't involved. Forcing the practice of Scientology at work is against California law. But Scientology didn't do it, DisKeeper did.
Exactly, the person responsible will take the fall, resign from his position in WISE and give a load of money to the Church of Scientology, and then he'll find a different way to get new members and be right back in the Church's arms probably.
Religious discrimination isn't prohibited, per se. Try applying for a job at your local Catholic church if you're an atheist and see what I mean.
A church is a non-profit organisation, Diskeeper can't make this claim.
It's a software company though, a kosher restaurant has a lot more links to Judaism than disk defragmenting has to do with Scientology.
Mod points aren't that important but you seem to be a whore for them in every article. Are you a scientologist or something?
What an appropriate article to post those 2 sentences in.
So. That means you get to practice your religion in the cube next to me, but I get to carry my handgun in case you try to ritualistically sacrifice me?
Erm... Yes, exactly, as long as he doesn't force his religion on you, and you only use your gun if needed in self defense.
Although they can say you can't bring a gun in of course.
What I really want to know is what the fuck the point you're trying to make it, discriminating against people of a different religion when hiring is a crime, regardless of whether your a Christian, a Muslim or a Scientologist, if a company forced it's employees to go confess to a priest or go to Church it would get sued also.
He's saying the church of Scientology does it, and the owner of the company funds them.
If you look into it you'll see a history of child abuse in the Church of Scientology, they claim that it hasn't happened in over 20 years (Not that it never happened) but there've been quiet a few (now ex-)members of the church testifying that it's happened more recently than that.
As for kitten killing I'm not as sure, just googled and found http://www.solitarytrees.net/pickets/sp992a.htm, but no idea how many of those stories are true, and I don't really care enough to go and look into them, I've heard of the first story before a few times though and it seems likely that at least that one is true.
Does Microsoft hold Windows users at gunpoint? Who, exactly, is forced to use Windows?
People with jobs. You've probably met a couple and never even realised it.
Saying that "A government owned X is a good idea" is not the same as saying "All X should be government owned without any competition".
You can have a government-owned business as well as privately owned ones, in competition.
The whole point is that YOU don't need to do the maths, it's done for you, big red bars mean you'll probably hurt(or be hurt) a lot, big green bars don't.
Or simpler and more accurate, big bars at top mean you'll miss a lot, big bars at bottom mean you'll hit a lot.
Yeah, they should've just included the amount of Linux systems in the summary instead of forcing everyone to RTFA.
Systems programmers are the high priests of a low cult. -- R.S. Barton