Winamp had plugins for formats not anticipated by the operating system. I once (LONG ago) wrote a simple plugin that executed .bat files, so I could queue OS commands in my playlist (shutdown at the end of the list, etc.). Pretty cool (if I might say so myself :) ).

Pft, that's NOTHING! I listen to 28 weeks of music for breakfast!

Yes, but the first result is this post!!!

That is actually quite interesting. So, do they still have pitch for "yes" as well?
How about a positive answer to a negative question? As in "doch" in German (or "jo" in Danish, "jawel" in Dutch", "si" in French). English is "yes" or "yes I am" or something to remove the ambiguity.

I think it's not NAT per se that people want, but the upstream security you mention. I like having one box doing my security so the box I work on doesn't have to spend CPU cycles worrying about that. That the upstream box does NAT too, is just a means to an end in a still predominantly IPv4 world. But because that box is the NAT box, and because that box provides security, NAT = security, in most people's minds.

No, but a Christian book store specializes in Christian books. A store that specializes in non-christian books isn't specializing but censoring. I get Hatta's point. It's a very thin line to walk.

I think a store can differentiate on the things they sell without it being censorship. For example, a toy store probably won't sell cough drops. An erotica store (sex shop) might sell erotic literature that a normal book store might not. Amazon has some of the same policies in place and that is their right. If someone finds a way around the toy store's policy by selling cough drops in playful packages, then the toy store might consider not selling them anymore after finding out.

If, however, the toy store starts removing anything that kinda looks like a cough drop in a frenzy. Then, yes, that would be censorship.

First of all, why small? If you're going to kamikaze anyway, then do it well. Secondly, srsly? It's not like these things are made from paper maché, they're expensive you know.

So how does this compare to the haptic feedback of the Steam Controller. Same idea? Completely different?

Maybe create bouncy castles out of them. Just destroying them seems so wasteful... :)

Or at least a viable nutrient for the Korean population.

It should read "Detective Derrick and his rat partners cost just eight pounds on the head each and are capable of being trained to...". Because while rats don't care about money, they dislike being pounded on the head a lot.

Which is the goal, ultimately. At least when used to detect drugs, explosives or other illegal substances. So even if it were easier to identify molecules flying around in the air than it is to build a smelling machine, it's easier still to use smelling animals.

+1 informative

For the same reason you shouldn't pay a programmer by lines of code.