The primary reason why AutoProfile is not prior art is because the IBM patent specifically refers to a: remote controller, suitable for use while viewing media programming and content
I primarily use my computer to "view media programming and content." The remote controller in this context is usually called a computer mouse.
and:
The enhanced remote controller allows the viewer to both communicate with a blogging server, and thus to a blogging service, as well as to display responses to and from other bloggers with whom the viewer is communicating. These blog communications may be accomplished without the viewer having to leave the broadcast receiver of the television.
which AutoProfile is not and has no functionality for.
Sorry, wrong plugin.
If it's the fact the remote can post twitter updates, how is it any different than a nokia tablet with mythetomer? Or a phone that can also be used as a remote control? I use bluetooth to change the channels on my MythTv for example, and could you really say your tivo isn't technically a computer?
I'm aware that Nokia and Motorola didn't specifically design a phone for this purpose, but it probably is already used as such by some users.
So maybe it's time for both kernel developers and distribution packagers to focus a little bit more on which hardware users are buying. Which is not multi (4+) core servers, but rather cheap laptops and netbooks.
Someone's buying those, and it's the people with the money. Con Kolivas ran into the same problem years and years ago.
It may be the more interesting aspect of this story isn't the record industry losing customers, but the younger generations skipping the main marketing arm of the recording industry, FM radio.
MTV already replaced radio for this function a long time ago. You mentioned Britney Spears; I didn't hear her on the radio, rather I "heard" her first single on Carson Daily's TRL. MTV is quickly being replaced by YouTube, ala OK Go.
Damn Brit was hot as a 17 year old school girl though (before you say anything, I was 16 at the time)
Word of mouth only goes so far, and advertising is expensive.
In the days of people having 100s (if not1000s) of "friends" on sites like Facebook, "word of mouth" is a hell of a lot more effective than it ever was before - and that's likely to remain true going forward.
I actually tend to think the opposite. I have so many friends on facebook that aren't my real friends that invites over fb tend to mean less to me then a phone call, or even an email. Plus you know that everyone invites their entire friends list so you don't get the feeling that the person really wants you to be there.
Don't compare floating point numbers solely for equality.