Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:On the contrary, AppleTV would be core (Score 1) 245

I doubt any of these patents have anything to do with a gaming console. We all read how much money it takes to enter the console gaming market. The console are subsidized, etc. Apple is into big margins not paying you to buy their stuff and make it up later. My guess is that all these patents are just interesting ideas by engineers at apple. Anyone who's worked for a tech company with money knows they pay you to file patents. And every jack-ass in sight is busy cranking them out for that extra few grand every year. Besides, the patents are intentionally vague to make it harder to understand what the fuck they're talking about. Notice how the article starts making assumptions as to what they're actually saying. Proof-in-point, they're supposed to be hard to figure out. This way the patent covers as board of a range as possible, therefore, making it more valuable. As far as the hiring of the gaming execs and chip designers. I don't know, maybe they're there to beef up the hand-held gaming on iphones and ipod touches. That's more likely than a console.

Comment Re:What did we expect? (Score 1) 627

If the intention of the spec is to be able to read/write documents between products, then the spec is a failure. The tests clearly show this. I'm sort of inclined to say that aside from performance, and nasty schemas, this is yet another reason why xml sucks. If the spec allows you to extend things with arbitrary namespaces, then you can never hope for the degree of compatibility that people are hoping for. Product developers are always going to inclined to one-up competitors by implementing features that other products don't. The apparent way to do that while still being "compliant", will be to add namespaces that are unknown to competing products.
Social Networks

Is It Worth Developing Good Games For the Web? 82

SlashSlasher writes "A friend of mine started up a Facebook MMORTG game called Realm of Empires with his buddies as a personal project. Over the last couple of years, I've seen it grow up from an idea into a thriving community. A lot of money and effort has been sunk into constant improvement. As a result, it has become one of the most polished and substantial applications I've seen on Facebook. It's been quite interesting seeing the action behind the scenes without being directly entangled. Normal gameplay is free but certain premium features do exist. Recently, after allowing an open beta of premium features, the users complained vehemently that they would have to pay to keep these special features. They went so far as to start a petition to stop them from charging for premium features. People are getting up in arms about features that can be bought for less than $3 a month. I know the project hasn't broken even yet, and more money is put into it every day. I had always assumed that developers would receive a chunk of the ad revenue they attract to Facebook; apparently I was wrong. Facebook only gives the developer a very small (and shrinking) piece of real estate to try and make money with. How are these people supposed to break even, let alone profit? What working business models exist for the small game developer? Are people just too spoiled by free, throw-away games to be a target market for anything significant? Are developers who want to make any money for their work forced to move to restrictive platforms like the iPhone or the console market? More details of their story are available at their blog."
Cellphones

Apple Planning Video-Call iPhone 268

An anonymous reader writes "The recently awarded iPhone patent contains hidden claims which indicate Apple is planning to bring video calling and recording features to the iPhone, according to InfoWeek blogger Alex Wolfe. Buried within the 'embodiments' section of patent number 7,479,949 is this: 'In some embodiments, the functions may include telephoning, video conferencing, e-mailing, instant messaging, blogging, digital photographing, digital videoing, web browsing, digital music playing, and/or digital video playing.' Wolfe also cites language indicating Apple is aware that having a rear-facing camera is an impediment towards video calls (and also taking pictures of yourself.): 'In some embodiments, an optical sensor is located on the front of the device so that the user's image may be obtained for videoconferencing while the user views the other video conference participants on the touch screen display.' Screen caps of the patent drawing are also available."

Comment Re:One of the worst proprietary vendors... (Score 1) 168

Wow. I'm glad I'm reading this. I've been going for a year now without anti-virus on my windows pc at home for fear of installing some shit that slows my machine to a crawl. I had no idea symantec sucked this bad. I think I'll stay with my current procedure which is to do microsoft's online check once every week that's free. Probably isn't going to do much, but what the hell, it does seem to find unused items from your registry and remove them.

Comment Re:Hello Moto (Score 1) 828

This is one of the major downfalls of the various opensource licenses. Just like another reader posted about the fragmentation of the linux dekstop applications, we have a worse problem with licensing. How can we expect commercial software vendors to extend, build upon, contribute, etc. if the geeks can't even explain what the license means. Can I link? Can I change and sell? Who's gonna sue me? It's way too complicated. The licensing thing. And it's the same theme as the desktop application world. What toolkit does a commercial software vendor use? KDE, QT, Gnome, Mono? I think the open source philosophy in general suffers from too much chaos.

Comment Re:stupid question but..... (Score 1) 563

There is apparently this interesting phenomenon in politics where the ruling party can do what the other party is traditionally known for and not take any public heat for it. For example, Obama is going to be able to cut corporate taxes and take a giant shit on your personal privacy, but because the republicans are typically known for this type of stuff, he'll be able to get away with it without the media making a big show of it on the 6 o'clock news. I'm not sure why it is, but I suspect that people just assume that it's the part sort of playing middle ground whereas the republicans would get hammered for ignoring the "little guy". FYI: This is in no way an endorsement of either party. As far as I'm concerned, they're all selfish bastards.
Businesses

How Long Should Companies Make E-Bills Available? 299

theodp writes "If you say goodbye to paper and hello to green, you may learn first-hand that no good deed goes unpunished. Try to pay your final Verizon Wireless bill online after switching carriers, for example, and don't be surprised if you get a sorry-Dave-I'm-afraid-I-can't-do-that reply. Other vendors may curtail e-Bill services 30 days after you end service. And a promise of access to up to seven years of paperless statements is somewhat empty if you'll be cutoff as soon as you no longer have an account. With more-and-more companies enticing consumers to go paperless, how long a period of time should the records be made available online? Should it extend beyond the life of an account?"
It's funny.  Laugh.

Apple Introduces "MacBook Wheel" 268

CommonCents noted an Apple announcement a few hours before the anticipated keynote. He says "Apples' latest must have gadget does away with the keyboard. With the new MacBook Wheel, Apple has replaced the traditional keyboard with a giant wheel."

Slashdot Top Deals

Whatever is not nailed down is mine. Whatever I can pry up is not nailed down. -- Collis P. Huntingdon, railroad tycoon

Working...