Comment Does it run windows? (Score 4, Funny) 124
We're all doomed!
We're all doomed!
My porch light is part of the local ecosystem. I have Mediterranean house geckos living behind the siding on my house. They come out at night to feed under the porch light. If I get rid of the light, who will feed the poor starving lizards? Won't someone think of the lizards?
Either way, an image is only built by gathering spatial information of the scene.
Except for holograms. They work by creating an interference pattern on/in the detector(film). Pedantic, I know, but let's be accurate.
There are definitely worse smells
Yeah, like 1,4-diaminobutane. So simple, yet so rotten!
Hey Doc! Here's another one!
A group of renouned clinical psychiatrists, consulting with world-recognized anthropoligists, claim certain theoretical physicists are off their meds, and should be gently captured and returned to therapy.
I do prefer going in person and just grunting... they know what I want anyway.
Are you Tim Allen IRL?
Why not ramp up production of ethylene oxide sterilization units? They are just basiclly sealed cabinets. It is very effective, and works well on sensitive materials that cannot tolorate heat or harsh methods.
...see sig.
The original article http://sandlab.cs.uchicago.edu... has some interesting graphs showing efficacy under certain situations. Looks like sometimes it can be fairly effective. What's missing are the frequency (ies) and sound energy the bracelet (transducers) puts out. Normal conversation is about 60 dB in amplitude. If you can get an SPL out of the transducers exceeding this, then the source (conversation) to noise (jamming) ratio will be low enough that the level will swamp the input of the listening device. The signal has to go through an A/D converter on the front end, and if you can get enough volume out of the jammer, that's all it will pick up. No amount of post filtering will make the signal intelligible.
Great tease, but nowhere is the URL of the *actual* (enhanced) picture shown.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/space...
There, fixed that for you...
As long as the rules are understood, I don't care what Facebook puts up as ads. They should be marked in a way so that they will be understood as political ads, not just random commentary. If Facebook's rules are that politicians can say whatever (lie) and not be censored, then it's understood that what's in the politician's ads may actually *be* lies.
Likewise, if the rules are that PACs must be truthful, and will be censored if caught, then that's what you know to expect going in.
Until the point where you actually *measure* the results, collapsing the wave function, and nope, it doesn't work...
egrep -n '^[a-z].*\(' $ | sort -t':' +2.0
