He didn't actually serve a full-term. It was more like 2/3.

I miss Weekly World News. The crazier the stories in that "paper" the funnier for me. Such cheap entertainment.

Except that Apollo 18 was released last September and died a deservedly quick death at the box office. Maybe this is for the "prequel".

Wow. I am about 9-10 hours from the closest dealership. I'm so there!

We don't have to suppose the Captain steered the ship off-course causing the crash that killed some passengers, and then proceeded to order some dinner instead of calling for evacuation, and then when learning the ship really was in danger, bailing out and leaving the passengers to fend for themselves. Hell, the crew had been telling people to return to their cabins for sometime before the evacuation started.

The media has nothing to do with it. This guy is an incompetent fool who killed passengers by steering the ship into this disaster on purpose(and totally off course) and left lots of them to their own devices to save his own neck. He's can't be the fall guy if he actually committed the crime.

No, that is actually what they are supposed to do BY LAW. And the Captain murdered those people just as if he put a gun to their head and pulled the trigger by changing the course of the ship and coming too close to land like that. Unreal that you would defend a piece of sh!t like that . You're pathetic.

How many times does someone have to point out that this is not fact, but a guess of what might happen? Seriously, you are a broken record playing the same lame song.

I have read this thread, among others like it, which is beside the point. There is simply no evidence for "millions of deaths" because it is an event that has not yet occurred. Game over. Thanks for playing.

Fail.

Your claims are baseless nonsense. Thankfully, you are not in any position of power.

This is exactly part of the problem that I see among the more vocal proponents of AGW. Millions of deaths? Do you have any evidence for this purported scenario/outcome? To me it smacks of the "sky is falling we are all doomed please won't you think of the children?" BS that gets us nowhere.

I'm trying to understand why the article mentions that 3,126 earth scientists were surveyed when they only focus on the most frequently(and recently) published climate scientists(79 total). If the other earth scientists don't matter then why survey them at all? And the PDF itself says that the survey was sent to 10,257 earth scientists so the response to the survey was only about 30% of the total. I'm not sure how that can be considered a consensus when far less than half even bothered to take the survey. YMMV.

*does not lend

The problem with the modelling is that it cannot actually tell us what will happen in the future. It's just a guess based on certain parameters at a given time. And basing government policies(that will affect how and where tax money gets spent) on said models is ridiculous. And it doesn't help to have some scientists running around telling everyone the sky is falling and we're all doomed unless we do X, Y and Z RIGHT NOW. I know that gets the most attention, but that does not help anyone. It certainly does lend credibility to their position.