Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:nice (Score 1) 142

I recommend you to read up on party-list proportional representation voting systems. Because you can vote for individual candidates, but the party will also recieve a vote at the same time. Whenever a vote for a party list has elected on its candidate list, the votes from thereon pass onto the next one, and so on.

They are not indirectly elected, because their listing has to be made official prior to the election, and moreover, the list has to appear on every ballot, in order.

So even if it was indirect, it is very transparent.

Comment Re:nice (Score 4, Informative) 142

The EC (unelected and largely unaccountable)

Come on, quit that old bullshit.

The European Commission is appointed and controlled by the governments of the member states, all of them democratically elected.

Ah, indirectly. Most - if not all - EU countries use a parliamentary system, which means our governments are not directly elected, but elected by the parliaments which are directly elected. So you have voters > local parliament > local government > EC. So yeah, that's quite far from the voters. Compare to the EP: voters > EP. One step.

A lot of special interests are bound to be happening through those steps. However, the EC has far less power with the passing of Lisbon, so I wouldn't worry too much.

Submission + - Why it is not possible to overload the semicolon operator in C++ (youtube.com)

Svippy writes: "Students at Department of Computer Science at University of Copenhagen (DIKU) were able to get Bjarne Stroustrup himself to agree to an interview, where important questions were asked, such as why C++ is so ugly. The interview, which appears in part of a larger IT-related sketch show called topDatamat (2:25 in), will eventually be put online in a longer, uncropped form."

Comment Re:Wow (Score 1) 484

Woah. I always thought that Metro was a positive step away from the Aero of Vista/7 and whatever they called that cartoon thing in XP. Both of those looked ridiculous, so I always ended up switching to Windows Classic, which - despite its ugliness - doesn't at least pretend to be something it is not.

But boy, did they miss the train with Metro on the desktop. I was thinking (hoping) that they would sort of redesign it, rather than just making it be Aero Glass without gradients and transparency. I am quite amazed at how ugly it looks.

Comment Re:uhhh... (Score 4, Insightful) 1027

I agree that the tiles are more confusing than helping. But the Metro design is actual a huge improvement from the Apple-lookalike Auro crap from Vista and the cartoonish joke thing from XP. So much so, that I always pick Windows Classic when I theme a Windows box. I'd much rather look at a broken Metacity than those. At least Metro looks streamlined and without dumb attempts at round borders and gradients.

That being said, it is hardly used to its full potential by making its content so ridiculous.

Slashdot Top Deals

IF I HAD A MINE SHAFT, I don't think I would just abandon it. There's got to be a better way. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.

Working...