Comment Duh. (Score 1) 188
Now
Ya, everyone already knows this - duh. That's why Voyager has bio-neural circuitry.
Now
Ya, everyone already knows this - duh. That's why Voyager has bio-neural circuitry.
The first half was a very good science-fiction movie
So, just like systemd then.
I have watched a few Poettering videos and he comes off as a massively arrogant douche bag (but I am a fan of Linus and RMS so *shrug*).
How do you feel about Theo? I think there must be some deep psychological understanding you can come to based on people's reactions to Linus, RMS, Theo, and Poettering, but I have no idea what.
All four of them are massively arrogant, though three have earned it and deserve some respect, but only one is a douche bag.
The joke is going to be on humanity when our kidneys get clogged with nano particles.
Stop being so alarmist. Our lungs will get clogged way before that.
The "freedom" is for the ISPs - the only things, I mean, corporations, I mean, *people* (thanks Citizen's United) that Republicans care about.
"What the fuck did I just read?"
Having only cringed at the previews and not actually seen CSI: Cyber, I can only say that what you just read is the the first
Agreed, but rather than M$ systems, I was thinking other Unix systems, and not necessarily Internet facing. I've worked several places, admittedly a while ago, that still rely on big-iron systems running Solaris, HP-UX, etc... That kind of hardware can have advantages over a lot of hardware usually used to run Linux (VMs or bare-metal), but you also pay for it.
... the vast majority of servers run Linux,
Um... "vast majority"? Citation please.
But it may make code more maintainable.
Stating that something "may" do something, without additional qualifiers, is really no statement at all.
He may now be famous enough that he couldn't be simply "disappeared" or sent to Guantanamo.
"Simply" maybe not, but "accidents" happen to people all the time...
Does the iTunes Terms of Service, to which users presumably agreed, specify that Apple may add (or remove) things to (from) your device that you did not request and/or w/o your specific consent? If so, then your analogy holds (at least technically) else it doesn't.
I suspect that people got bent out of shape because either Apple wasn't really allowed to do this sort of thing, or people didn't realize Apple actually was allowed to.
Not asking permission is theft.
I'm a fan of U2 and I can see how some people might consider what they did rude or presumptuous, but theft? - No,
Not theft, but how about "breaking and entering"? Apple entered (violated) people's personal space w/o permission.
Honestly, I'm still baffled so many people were upset about getting a few album from a popular, well respected, rock band, simply because it found its way directly onto people's devices. It's not as if it woke you up at 3am and started playing it!
Image, instead, that Apple broke into people's houses and left a physical copy of the U2 album on dining room table. How do you think you / everyone would feel about that? While you might argue that digitally pushing the album out isn't really the same thing, it kind of is. Apple entered (violated) people's personal space w/o permission.
I've auditioned some pretty amazing earbuds.
As opposed to "tried"?
... karma is a real witch.
Pretty sure that's not the right word - unless you're Lanie Jordan. Get some balls Washington Post.
"Ada is the work of an architect, not a computer scientist." - Jean Icbiah, inventor of Ada, weenie
