This hack uses the card for room 123 to figure out the decryption key and from that generate a programming card and a master key card. The programming card can then be tapped on any room to program the master key card

Dozens of people!

By that logic I could "Force" someone to get a vaccine by offering a $10 coupon for pizza since then if they don't take advantage of it they're out some pizza.

But that's disingenuous because the people against recycling weren't against it because they thought the plastic industry was scamming people, they were against it because they didn't care about the environment or were too lazy to recycle (even recycling stuff that makes sense to recycle). Even the people against recycling took the plastics industries claim at face value

The "going fast up into space" part worked, it was just the "slowing down before the water" and "coming out of space" parts that had some issues. Not a problem if you want to stay up in space

Basically what they're saying is that banning tiktok or forcing the sale of it to protect user data is a band-aid solution while the underlying problem remains. If the goal is to protect user data then the bill should be to protect user data (but of course US corps would lobby hard against that).

No, that's what people who don't understand the internet want. One of two things happen without section 230:
1. Sites perform moderation and are held liable for all comments. The result of this will be the sites will not allow any comments (including messages boards like slashdot). Possibly some sites will have an option to review each one, but no company wants that liability.
2. Sites don't perform moderation and are not liable for comments. Without moderation, sites will become cesspools of spam and scammers while trolls run rampant. While this is typically what people with abhorrent views are in favor of, it will result in basically all message boards becoming unusable.

Option 3.
Sites perform reasonable moderation, but users are liable for what they post. This is what we have now and matches what public forum IRL are like. People have the freedom to post but with that freedom comes responsibility and consequences. One of those consequences is that they might not be allowed on that site anymore.

Good thing analog locks have no vulnerabilities!

After watching the launch, I can confirm the final answer is "all of them"

That said, it's not clear if it was the tiles falling off that caused it to die

What you meant*

That was the implication

Basically the tests suck. There's a lot of stuff on the SATs that isn't particularly useful, but you can study for so kids that get tutors or enroll in programs specifically to get good scores on the test can get better scores.

Making less of it means less of it gets released. Pretty basic stuff.

???
Where is that the case in the US? It's certainly not common. Usually schools are given testing requirements but they don't get more money if scores are higher. I suppose it's included in a teacher's performance review so in the sense that the teacher wants to remain employed it's about money, but basically that's just policy.

But that's still not entirely clear. Are fannypacks an item? What about an extra pair of shorts with pockets? Bottle of water?

The problem isn't the number of items but the amount of space they take. If you can fit 15 items under your seat then it shouldn't make a difference than if you put them all in a bag. The airlines should just say passengers can only put one item in the overhead bins, but that means that the flight attendants needs to enforce it