Comment Re:Two Words... (Score 1) 133
Sounds good to me...
Sounds good to me...
She's developed the ability that when the front 2 paws are on the higher step, and her good back leg is on the lower step she'll angle her butt so that the stump is at the edge of the top step. The little stump will then twirl and while it's doing it's think she'll bring the back leg up and keep going.
Watching it almost reminds me of those famous horse pictures proving that a horse has 4 feet off the ground at a time...
i wonder if the treatment included retraining the cat on burying its business in the cat box.
Actually, both of my cats at home use their front paws to side paw the littler on top... So yes, assuming she doesn't step in it (unlikely) she'd be fine and up to the usual tracking the litter out of the box like normal...
PS: (Yes, I have a 3 legged cat so I have a basis for asserting this.)
PPS: ( Anyone have a 1 and 2 legged so I can complete the set? )
PPPS: (Yes, I like parenthesis).
Sadly starting a fire or tripping a breaker won't work very well for anyone in IT, they'd just be stuck at work over the weekend making sure everything was working (or in the case of a fire, building new servers with no time to sleep or rest).
You sound like you're speaking from experience?
Assuming vertical wall, you won’t be able to see them. You’re looking down.
Plus, the camera is using thermal imaging, so a moving shadow wouldn’t show up well.
With any spheroid looking down unless you're directly beneath the camera there will be angled views.
As for thermal imaging - overlooked that part...
The opening is estimated to be 620 feet by 520 feet and the hole to be at least 380 feet deep. Wow! That beats even goatse!
I'm sure you'll be moderated funny (as you should)
I looked at the pictures, and it seems that they had a bug on the lens.
In all seriousness, though, I wonder how they can determine the depth of the hole, just from the surface characteristics?
Simple (somewhat)
>>
Rather versus Whether vs. Weather... The joys of English.
This would essentially put the government in charge of choosing which press agencies to sponser... Dangerous precedent...
I respect lavatory cleaning staff far above copyright lawyers.
Yet lawyers serve a purpose. Just because, in this case, their purpose is opposed to your interests does not make them scum.
The root issue we're disagreeing on is, I believe, rather a person is scum based upon the job they choose to perform. One person's scum is another person's necessity.
If this was not the MPAA or the RIAA but instead, an author of a self-published book that went viral on the internet (who knows - people might start reading again)
We're all glad to know that you're offended when people who are 'publicly' attacking other individuals are in turn attacked as individuals themselves.
I'm glad you're glad.
( Wonders : Does bringing up My Lai in this context bring in an Asian Godwin's law? )
I do know, however, that to impose my beliefs that the lawyers are scum on them in a legal manner and make judgement based on that is not something I would want others doing to me.
Different jobs involve varying degrees of moral direction - some would consider repossessing cars to be evil, vile and dispicable - while others see the necessary need for loaners to recoup their outlay.
Do I not like what these lawyers are doing? Sure
Do I think these lawyers are performing what their job requires them to do? In all probablity, yes
Is an individual going to stay on moral high-grounds when his job is on the line? Rarely, and I can't fault them for it - especially not in this case.
"Look! There! Evil!.. pure and simple, total evil from the Eighth Dimension!" -- Buckaroo Banzai