You're wrong and a peddler of falsehoods, but you can repent and be forgiven.

Shirley you ingest.

"She went with the WHOLE BAND!" screamed Herb.

My cousin was featured on a JJ episode somewhere around #40.
And no: I reject "mass media" opinion.

Before long we'll be able to clone you your Reagan doll.

There is nothing funny about your calls to embrace the suck. Nothing.

I don't believe falsehood is the new truth, no matter how packaged. Utterly guilty. Ventilate at dawn.

Seems like what you want.

*sigh* Missed it by that much.

Except that my point is the antithesis of what you appear to claim.

I was just looking at 1Tim6:10. No, I don't believe I "would lose everything". What I think's going to happen is a major crisis and a hefty haircut across the board.
The point you're missing is that this system has no feedback loop in the hands of the people.
Until the analysis includes an honest look at the feedback in the system, we're just whinging here on /.
This is the Information Age, but our mentality is mired in older ways. Use Article V. Be your own Reagan. Redistribute the power. Or not.

Gets back to the first three words of the Constitution, not any specific candidate, and not from any (purportedly distinct) political party you can name.
Article V, baby.

Hey, if you're managing the = sign, you can (and will) try to make it mean the zaniest things.
And you will probably enjoy a pseudo-success. Under the sun, anyway. Best wishes on that!

Look: 2+2=4. I support and defend your right to say 2+2=5, for all I won't hire you for my taxes. Only in an insane world would treating foolishness as the new wisdom be anything other than mocked. But this is your world, I suppose, so mark me as required.

And the tax code is written by. . .those with the money. They retain the money by ensuring the tax code is written so that the system runs (temporarily) on OPM. 'Twas ever thus. Therefore I deem your thinking "magical".