IClass, meet Barbara.
His family with their values wouldn't be republicans now, regardless of the color of their skin.
You're waaaaay too confident there, Hot Rod.
Term limits are like chemotherapy. You're going to snuff a few otherwise decent careers, but going after the career cancer is needful.
As gospels go, it's a wretched bucket of fail. As propaganda for duping otherwise intelligent people, it's clearly been a smashing success.
The airbrush crew loves to forget that MLK was raised in a Republican house, in an era where that kind of meant something.
There's a balance to be struck, depending on the situation
You're basing that on an assumption of maturity that may no longer hold true.
Obama is not a president for "Progress", as the state has not expanded.
So you're trying to say that the Affordable Care Act doesn't exist?
Marx has identified Satan, the bourgeoisie in his telling, and promised heaven if people just purge Satan from their midst in an apocalyptic class-warfare meltdown. Amiright?
This is a comely tale for the crowd that has rejected Christianity, yet still needs at least an ersatz existential model.
Yet nothing I've seen thus far models the real existential model of the fallen individual who needs to be purged of sin and directed correctly, i.e., toward Christ.
Marxism is a nihilistic joke played by Satan himself, and you're a fool if you don't recognize it straight up.
Every political action of any consequence that has been taken in this country in the past several decades has been of a conservative - not progressive - slant.
Sure, there are more details than that, but I reject your notion that we've had any conservative Presidents, with a qualified exception for Reagan, who certainly didn't take these godforsaken entitlements out back and shoot them.
Furthermore, every conservative politician who has been trying to campaign against the Health Insurance Industry Bailout Act of 2010 has been campaigning to replace it with itself. This further supports the notion of Obama being deeply conservative in his actions - which are of course where his legacy will come from.
Alternatively, it supports the assertion that the country enjoys one party rule--The Progressive Party. Those understanding that this route only leads to European-style collapse, and opposing it, will be crushed.
In other words you are being disingenuous when you claim to have read it at all. Doesn't your Lord advocate humility and warn against being a braggart?
Oh, so I don't agree with you, and thus I'm being disingenuous?