Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What are we paying them for? (Score 4, Insightful) 221

Yes and no...
> Is the water you drink clean?
In some places, the local government is in charge of the water supply. In others it's subsidized and regulated by them. Either way, the government is in the loop.

> Is your food supply safe?
While this is always provided by private industry in this country, it is rather heavily regulated by the government at all levels to ensure a safe food supply.

> Do the lights come on when you flip a switch?
Again, in some places, the local government is in charge of the electricity supply while in others it's subsidized and regulated by them. Either way, the government is in the loop.

> Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars?
While the actual air travel is provided by private industry, you can thank the government for not having to worry about crashing into other planes midair, parts falling off the planes, (Due to safety regulations) and safety from terrorists and other baddies on planes. (#3 is debatable, although they are *trying*...)

> When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers?
This is another area where, although private industry provides the actual service, the government makes it possible. The FCC licenses frequencies to certain groups and ensures they don't interfere with each other. Think of the madness if anyone could broadcast anything they wanted on any frequency!

> Can you read this message?
> Are you speaking English?
Although there is private education in this country, there is also free public education. It's highly likely that a person picked at random went to public school and learned to read and write there.

The government may not be perfect - none is - but it is functioning on some level and you are getting services from it, whether you like it or not. Your job as a citizen is to try to fix the parts of it which are broken.

Comment Re:Disagree (Score 3, Interesting) 248

I'm just an armchair-sim pilot, but IMHO the KSFO approach is SUPER easy compared to some other ones. There aren't really any turns for noise abatement or any other weird things like some approaches have. All planes are basically put into 2 single files lines south of SFO, turned towards the runway, (28L or R generally depending on if they are arriving from the East or West) and go. Contact SFO tower when they are over the San Mateo bridge, and that's it. Fly straight and on the correct glideslope, nothing out of the ordinary to worry about. Occasionally ATC will ask them to change runways, so they should have the charts for the alternate ready to go, as well as the autopilot ready to re-configure, but that probably only happens 10-20% of the time. (AFAIK it didn't happen for the Asiana flight, not sure about this one.)

Comment Re:Reality check... (Score 1) 164

It's too bad Google can't force the car companies to design an innovative car they way Google forces cell phone companies to innovate.

Google *IS* innovating the car - it just isn't out yet as it's still in their internal testing, but I've seen several cars driving around the area with funny sensors mounted on them. Maybe it's not *electric* innovation, but it is innovation.

Comment Re:I would, but... (Score 1) 276

You should be talking to your Representative, not your Congressman. The Representatives are the ones who are supposed to voice the will of the people - Congressmen voice the will of the state. That is why there are only 2 Congressmen per state, but multiple Representatives based on the population.

Representatives have your best interest in mind, Congressmen have your states. (Well, that's the theory at least.)

Comment Re:I hope it happens. (Score 1) 341

And I certainly can't envision using aerial drones to help with wildfire control. Or environmental surveys. Or mapping. Or weather. Or any number of legitimate government functions. It's all to spy on intermodal

I can envision all of those uses for drones. Just not by our federal government.

Give the firefighters wildfire drones.
Give the USGS mapping drones.
Give the NOAA environmental and weather.
Make *ALL* drone data public!

That I would be OK with, especially if said drones were customized to the task at hand. (ie: wildfire drones carry some water/retardant to spray and heat-sensitive camera tuned to look specifically for fire.)

But the NSA/FBI/Big Brother have no legitimate use for drones, ESPECIALLY ones that are aloft 24/7.

Comment Re:longitude and latitude (Score 1) 478

So, I am confused how this is better than longitude and latitude? I can use L&L offline, and it can have almost an infinite precision. Also, with my memory I am no more likely to remember the 3 words here than a long string of numbers.

*ALMOST* infinite precision? Add another decimal place and you get better precision. Keep adding them and you get infinite precision. Hell, you could keep adding decimal places until you get down to a specific atom! (Although that would be rather silly and probably impossible to actually measure with today's technology.)

Slashdot Top Deals

I program, therefore I am.

Working...