Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What about Magic? (Score 1) 136

As in Magic the Gathering? The card game with 12,000+ individual cards? In my honest opinion, it's the greatest game ever made. It's incredibly complex, and yet still understandable.

May I ask how many of those cards you actually use in practice? Think hard: how often have you built a deck that used that white 1/1 banding creature card (I forgot its name...)? It's not limited to uninteresting common cards, either. When I looked into selling my shoebox full of cards, I got told that players seldom fielded Serra Angels or Thunder Spirits anymore because there were better white creatures -- whereas back when I played, you'd find a few of either or both in nearly every white deck.

Back when I played, there were (give or take) a half dozen cards per extension that players (bar beginners) cared to use in practice. You'd be looking into perhaps two or three hundred cards when building your decks. Even less (though admittedly from a slightly different set) when building a highly themed deck -- those were the only reason you'd keep cards like Goblin Bombs in your shoebox. With a few hundred cards, you've more than enough to build a deck around pretty much every theme you want.

Comment Don't underestimate China (Score 1) 202

Keep China's high population, the latter's geographical repartition (mostly to the east), its economy's high growth rates by western standards, and the fact that it's a developing country (still under-equipped) all in mind. Not to mention its government's authoritarianism. In that light, 40 million connected households in two years is not unrealistic imho.

Comment Re:I dunno... (Score 1) 776

Nah, the brainfuck version is a mere google away: :-)

>++++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<[>+>[-]>++++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+<<[->>->+<<<]>>>
  [-<<<+>>>]<>>+++<<[->+>-[>+>>]>[+[-<+>]>+>>]<<<<<<]>[-<+>]+>[-]>[<<->>[-]]>[-]
  <<<[[-]++++++++++[>++++++++++<-]>++.+++.[-]<[-]+++++++++++[>+++++++++++<-]>+..
  [-]<[-]<<[-]>>]<>>+++++<<[->+>-[>+>>]>[+[-<+>]>+>>]<<<<<<]>[-<+>]+>[-]>[<<->>[
  -]]>[-]<<<[[-]+++++++++[>+++++++++++<-]>-.[-]<[-]+++++++++[>+++++++++++++<-]>.
  +++++..[-]<[-]<<[-]>>]<<[[-]>>++++++++++<[->-[>+>>]>[+[-<+>]>+>>]<<<<<]>[-]>>[
  >++++++++[<++++++>-]<.[-]]<>++++++++[<++++++>-]<.[-]<<<]>[-]++++++++++.[-]<[-]
  <-]

Comment Re:Locally produced Barium (Score 2, Informative) 270

Is there any other place to get Barium besides China?

They're called rare earth metals not so much because they're rare, since they're a bit all over the place, but because they're not concentrated enough to mine efficiently. This makes it highly polluting to extract them.

The US a couple more countries used to extract them, until China came along with no pollution standards, and priced everyone out of the market. Trouble is, you can't "just restart" such a mine. It's a decade long process to do so -- and it's in progress insofar as I've been following, because China decided to keep these strategic minerals for itself so as to keep high tech manufacturing at home.

Comment Re:What the what what? (Score -1) 270

which is used as contrast for upper and lower GI studies

What the hell are these studies and why is it assumed Slashdot readers would know what they are? What's a "contrast" in this context?

Gl stands for Glycemic load. Barium is a rare earth metal. No idea how the test works exactly.

Is the submitter seriously asking us to suggest alternatives to barium? Worst submission ever. It could have explained what this bullshit means, and why China needed to improve safety?

Mining rare earth metals is very polluting. In the past two decades or so, most countries stopped producing rare earth metals, because China was producing enough and at a lower cost than they did. (It helped to have no pollution standards.) recently, China decided to keep its rare earth metals for itself to keep electronics manufacturing at home, and sharply cut exports. At the same time, its local population is increasingly vocal about pollution.

And agreed... TFS sucks and the question it concludes on is absolutely ludicrous.

Comment Re:Dying gasps (Score 2) 535

Java though... makes me doubt the validity of TIOBE heavily, object-C doesn't help either, I get that there's a lot of android/iOS programming going on (I believe this is what object-C is used for mostly nowadays, but... more than 90% of businesses combined using .NET... doubtful). Maybe if TIOBE was based on +/- % changes I'd understanding, but as an overall popularity index, businesses have the $, and businesses use .NET unless they're web based...

And therein lies the rub in your argument. Many companies actually are web based. Many others are into mobile. And a shit ton of stuff is embedded or low level enough that .Net isn't even an option.

In my own industry (telco/finance), hardly anyone I'm aware of uses C# or VB.Net. It's almost all C for the low level stuff, Java for the enterprisy stuff, and java/Obj-C for mobile stuff. Oh, and there's some COBOL for legacy stuff, too.

In my brother's (automation/machine tools), it's mostly C for low level stuff, and C++ for higher level stuff.

In my sister's (public administration/archives), it's mostly web-based intranets.

And best I'm aware, games are mostly coded in C++ or (more recently) Obj-C++.

Admittedly, I haven't touched a Windows box in years, and my sample is too small to be noteworthy. In each case, though, note that .Net is nowhere in sight except on desktop apps such as Office. That's arguably where the volume dollars are at -- even though I'd suggest that volume dollars currently are in mobile.

At any rate, if TIOBE's metrics includes new lines of code produced per year, I for one am actually surprised that .Net came out on top last year.

Comment Re:Let's not get over ourselves, shall we? (Score 1) 247

because he seems to be, even though he admittedly found it necessary to ask his math teacher for information on vectors

"even though"? Are you somehow under the impression most smart people personally rederive the entire field of mathematics from scratch without any outside instruction?

Not. But fwiw, at his age, the brightest kids in a the class are frequently looking into what's coming next, as in what's taught a year or two later. On a more personal note, I never felt like an exception in doing so -- the brighter kids in some other classes did as much, and we had the nerdiest of conversations when we shared and discussed our findings. At any rate, at his age, many kids have a rather precise idea of what a vector is, or a matrix for matter. Some actually know enough of the latter to never need to ask about the former.

Also fwiw, and fyi, there actually are people out there who rederive a heck of a lot more than their teachers or peers wish they did. In particular in social sciences. But don't get me started.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any given program will expand to fill available memory.

Working...