When the two planets are on opposite sides of the sun (which is what, a period of less than a week happening less than once a year?), a third point will have to be used to "go around", reducing bandwidth and adding to latency, but it's still better than nothing.
I've seen most of the plans indicate a relay sent to Earth's L4 or L5 so that even when on the opposite side of the sun, communications would be uninterpreted, though the delay would be at its peak.
There's no way they can charge you with a new offense AT YOUR TRIAL and then prosecute you for it immediately like that.
When some jackass on the Internet disagrees with reality, I'll go with reality. For a traffic ticket, if you show up, they will generally always let you plea "no lo contendre" and get a fine without conviction. So it won't show up on your record, you don't have to tell your insurance company. Paying the fine is cheaper than fighting.
or it could be that he felt you were a legitimate danger to yourself and to the public and wanted to send you that message.
Of course, he didn't bother to issue a ticket for "careless/reckless" driving. Those usually require a stricter standard for a conviction. If he thought I was a legitimate threat, he should have charged me with it, rather than making up lies to harass someone innocent of the crimes accused.
This is clear evidence that smoking can cause cancer.
But no proof in a lab, as you require for evolution.
What's more, it has nothing to do with your argument for evolution - its a straw man to prove evolution by dispelling any myths about smoking and cancer. I see no relation between the two.
It has to do with the standard of proof you require for evolution. Proof "in a lab", which hasn't been done for smoking, which you believe in, and hasn't been done for evolution, which you don't believe in.
Your standards of "proof" differ based on your opinion. That makes the entire discussion illogical. I can make arguments for either, but your appeal to logic, then rejection of it is what I'm calling you out on.
I'll tell you what I believe but it matters not for your case of evolution because neither of us have proof either way. Which was my original point.
So your position is "I believe there is no proof, so anything you were to present as proof, I will dismiss without evaluating it." If you were more upfront that you believe Evolution to be false, rather than claiming a false belief that there's a lack of proof for it, it would be easier to ignore you in the first place.
we can't have a conversation because you apparently believe smoking does not cause cancer
You are wrong on that point, as you apparently are for every belief you hold. It was the first thing that popped into my mind that has *never* been proven in a proper scientific study to be true, while nearly all people believe it to be.
I don't believe smoking causes cancer, I know it does. So your argument doesn't make any sense the way its stated.
Yes, I realize now, no argument makes sense to a True Believer. You don't think that smoking is bad. You have no proof that it's bad. You have a few anecdotes, and a religious devotion to an idea that it's bad. You don't have, or need proof. And that's proof that you single out evolution for a double standard.
That, and evolution has been "proven" in a lab, where new traits have been developed based on environmental pressures. That you refuse to acknowledge reality doesn't change it. Since I haven't bothered to ask, I'll ask just to see your contortions to refuse to answer a direct question,:
Since you don't believe in Evolution, what do you believe is the origin of the species?
At any rate, you're straw-manning about smoking. I'm guessing you haven't had a close family member die of cancer caused by smoking because you'd understand the realities of it.
Just my aunt, and a few friends, and my father eventually died "early" because he was a smoker, though he didn't die of lung cancer like his sister.
So your answer is that you don't need "proof" for smoking, because you believe in it. But you need a higher standard of proof for evolution because you don't believe in it.
You talk about "proof" but it's all a lie. There is no "proof" that would satisfy you anyway. You are a Believer, not a rational person.
I think you struggle with this (evolution) as your belief but are happy to attack others who have a different belief because you think you have all the facts.
I never stated what I believe. I just called you out on your double standard. You should learn to read what people write, not make up stories in your head.
But I'll answer your question anyway since your level of mental understanding is so low. Smoking does cause harm, it has been proven. I can't seem to relay this concept to you in a way that you understand so I chose to skip it before.
It has never been proven "in a lab" that it does (in humans). So you hold one standard for smoking, and a different higher standard for evolution. Why? That's the question that I've been asking. I don't care about the smoking one, and haven't asked you the question you answered. Why do you hold one to a different standard?
But I won't digress to calling you a hypocrite or other names.
You believe smoking causes harm. You don't believe in evolution. Yet smoking harm has never met the standard you require for evolution. I asked why, and when you dodged the question in a course of mental masturbation around a bush, I pointed out this discrepency. I apologize if you can't take an honest criticism of your argument. I see now that honesty and truth offend. You've not given any, and you've wretched when any is presented to you.
God may be subtle, but he isn't plain mean. -- Albert Einstein
