Also I thought Amp was a Google standard for websites.

If you only need one car, perhaps your second, EV, vehicle should be an e-bike. I'm thinking about getting one myself.

I was driving, listening to Google's directions, but the phone volume was too low. I tried to turn it up, several times, but turning up the volume wasn't working; then the phone dialed 911!

After that I disabled the "feature".

Even if the flood in question has been there for millions of years and covers over 70% of the planet.

Would have made the messages unreadable. (If not the metadata.)

Why do we still send emails in plain text? Especially sensitive ones?

Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution says: "No State shall...make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts..."

So they can do gold coin or silver coin but not Bitcoin.

They've always been without power.

Now they're without electricity.

That was my first thought too. Apparently dental curing tools use a longer wavelength of light which should be even less likely to cause cancer. But someone should probably check now just in case.

Not those rocks, the other rocks. Specifically, carbonates, like calcium carbonate. A company in Iceland is working on accelerating the process, but it would eventually happen over thousands or millions of years anyway.

I expect direct synthesis of certain foods relatively soon. It makes sense to me to synthesize simple food products that we normally extract from other foods, wasting food in the process.

I've seen an article where starch was synthesized. Starch being a chain of sugar, we can synthesize sugar too. I'd like to see healthy fats synthesized, but it may be hard to synthesize fat that isn't trans fat.

For "theories" that are well-accepted, but aren't "laws". Especially if there are no scientific "laws".

I suggest calling them scientific "convictions". A conviction is something we strongly believe in. How do you get a conviction? By proving something beyond a reasonable doubt. Can a conviction be overturned? Of course! But it takes a lot of evidence.

It's a short step from this to accepting voice input for general commands. Voice input is basically the same as text. You have to deal with a few homophones, but they already need to deal with homonyms.

And then we'll see if voice input actually makes sense. Computer, insert a clip of Barclay saying, "I need a better interface."

"The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas...was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus." - K, Men in Black

I don't know about any blue site, but the people at the red site got Unicode into Slashcode.

Oh, wait, wrong kind of spider, nvm.