Need I point out that most billionaires are democrats or independents?
Wait, I'm confused. I thought the billionaires were the job creators. Then why are the Republicans fighting so hard to keep them from paying higher taxes?
Search for Amazon: looks like it simply redisplays the Amazon mobile site in an app and adds a few features e.g. writing a review into the native interface. In the absence of an official Amazon app for the Blackberry, it may well be useful for the avid Amazon shopper.
Given the tortoise-like speed of BlackBerry's web browser, just about anything that could be done on the web is better done in a BlackBerry app. When Google made a search app that ran on my BlackBerry, I used it all the time. Then I lost my copy of that app in a wipe/reload, and the newer version of their app won't install on my device, so now I have to use the web browser. In the time it takes for the search page to load, I can generally get to a computer or Android tablet and enter my query there instead. (Admittedly, I'm using a 3-year-old device on Verizon 3G, but still....)
This is the D.C. government we're talking about. Procurement irregularities there have kept investigative reporters employed there for decades.
The BAC was reduced last year from 0.08 to 0.05. in our province. It did not lead to a huge rise in BAC convictions, nor it did not lead to any lessening of the social stigma associated with drunk driving. What it did is make our roads safer.
Do you have accident counts to back that up? I find it hard to believe if the conviction rate (and presumably the arrest rate) didn't go up. I was all behind MADD until they continued lobbying for lower BAC levels after the limit was set to 0.008. It gets to a point of diminishing returns. The people getting into accidents seem to be way over 0.008, and rather than enlarge the net, the government needs to concentrate on preventing the ones caught DWI at existing levels from driving.
Perhaps you should make bribes illegal before you ask the people accepting those bribes to change any important laws...
Actually, in the U.S., bribes are illegal. The problem lies either in the definition of the term or in a closely related term, "influence".
Another problem, not exactly bribery or influence, is the problem that both parties seem to place more emphasis on making the other one look bad and lose seats, to the point that we end up seeing them take positions that are exactly the opposite of one formerly held just because the other party is now in favor of it. Examples include the 2009 healthcare act, passed by Democrats but originally proposed by Republicans a decade earlier, and the Republican flip-flopping over whether the budget should be balanced. (I'm sure there are examples of Democratic flip-flopping, but I admit of a bias that makes the Republican transgressions easier to see.)
Work continues in this area. -- DEC's SPR-Answering-Automaton