Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Just tell me (Score 2) 463

Well, I will definitely disagree with you. Transporting the patient certainly entails risks, it's not a freebee. Yes, Texas Presbyterian was not particularly prepared but they were dealing with patient zero as far a de novo infections are concerned. It turns out to be non trivial to keep full protections up, technique is very, very important. Therefore, it's not surprising that folks on the bleeding edge of the problem might bleed a bit.

Now, if we have the same problem in a couple of months, then we have issues. That would say that either health care workers are untrainable or there is something in the biology that we don't understand.

Be very sure that health care workers around the work are busily studying the CDC guidelines and protocols and this time, they might actually learn them.

Comment Re:No difference here (Score 4, Interesting) 279

You're insane. The insurance companies are at the end of the line here. Things are going to happen way too fast for insurance companies to change their policies, treatments are going to be medically necessary, the only question is whether the extra costs entailed by the infection precautions are going can be charged back to the patient's insurance (likely with a subsequent hissy fit about actually paying it).

No one is going to call Aetna and say 'can we treat Ms. Doe for potential Ebola exposure?' - that's not the way the system works. This sort of thing is something insurance companies hate - fast moving problems that can't rationally be refused. And hospitals are already on the hook for uninsured patients due to the EMTALA laws.

Slashdot Top Deals

C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas l'Informatique. -- Bosquet [on seeing the IBM 4341]

Working...