Comment Re:Well considering that many of us have low T (Score 1) 201
During that same time period, lifespans and overall health have improved. So what information leads you to think this constitutes a health problem?
During that same time period, lifespans and overall health have improved. So what information leads you to think this constitutes a health problem?
I'd never gotten around to watching Voyager, but just started watching it on Netflix, and I find this shocking. The lack of scientific knowledge shown by Janeway (and pretty much every member of the crew) is astonishing. Did they forget to hire a science fact check advisor for this series.?
With TNG, the science is sometimes silly or outdated or possibly wrong, but I'm never left with the feeling that the characters themselves are uneducated or scientifically illiterate. On Voyager, this is a common occurence.
I should clarify that I do not have their mobile phone service, rather, that as a customer, I often try to access their network of wireless hotspots.
Since the data is wifi only, I doubt data caps are an issue. On the other hand, as someone who lives in the region (and who is a customer) I know firsthand that there are plenty of dead spots where there will be no access. Want to call home from the supermarket to see if you need milk? You're going to need to walk out to the parking lot first.
On a side note, Cablevision offers customers free wifi routers for home use with their service. These routers also act as wifi hotspots for their network.
Notably missing from Mr. Curtis' statement is anything that would prevent him, or any other "citizen candidate", from taking campaign contributions from the same special interests, lobbyitsts, PACs, and corporate interests as the usual assortment of candidates.
"Leave people alone" is a statement so broad that it is completely meaningless. It is impossible to live in a manner that has no impact on other people. The hard and real question is always where the lines should be drawn.
SInce the key is presumably only useful when it is in the same location as the lock, how does this improve security?
And yet, I heard a different Republican senator being interviewed this morning, who stated that we need to tighten restrictions on immigration to low and no skill jobs, and allow more immigration of doctors and those with technical skills.
Long ago, I decided that when you hear an opinion from a US politician, all it really tells you is who is financing their campaign. Sometimes the opinion they give is just meant to warn somebody that they haven't contributed enough.
What is your native dialect, that you have such a hard time recognizing sarcasm or irony? Obviously, the distinction was being drawn to the fact that just because it was cold in the AC's backyard (around here) doesn't mean it wasn't warmer globally (everywhere).
When I was a child, you had to live at least a mile and a quarter from the school to qualify for the bus. Everyone else walked. This was considered absolutely normal. When I was in first grade, I went with some of the neighbor kids. I was six, and this was elementary school, so the oldest kid in the group was probably 10? Crime rates in the US are much lower today than they were then. Just dumb.
Shooting is too easy to trace. Why not just close down traffic in select locations. This could be done to inhibit people getting to the polls or to punish local businesses after the fact. Plus, experience shows it's much harder to pin this on anyone. Shootings tend to leave a smoking gun.
I don't know why you were modded down. The use of caveman speak to illustrate caveman logic is actually pretty funny.
An example of what? In the context given, it seems to be an example of something that should not be regulated because it is not a pollutant. Why is it not a pollutant? What does the fact that it is produced by breathing have to do with it?
Now, controlling pollution is good. You'll have a hard time finding even the most staunch libertarians that are against rules as far as keeping air and water quality good (Obama's big speech about them wanting dirty air and dirty water was likewise a straw man argument.) However CO2 doesn't play a role in that. I mean shit, we create it simply by breathing.
Well, shit, we create shit by shitting it. I therefore demand that you stop treating shit as a pollutant.
I'll continue to treat it as one, because I'm well aware that biological processes quite naturally produce all sorts of pollutants. But you go ahead and live by your rules.
Serious question. What would be the scientific benefit coming from discovering that there might have been life on Mars at some point?
Presumably, this discovery would be accompanied by some facts about the nature of the organisms that lived on Mars, not just the fact that they existed. It's hard to know what uses you can put knowledge to when you don't even know what that knowledge is yet.
"Free markets select for winning solutions." -- Eric S. Raymond