Comment Re:We've observed and created antiparticles (Score 1) 214
Did not know that. What kinds of medical imaging?
Did not know that. What kinds of medical imaging?
It's not about sight. It's always about measurement.
"Why would there be self selection for jobs on women's rights"
--an abject moron.
There absolutely was the accusation of a conspiracy theory there.
"I can't prove to myself he exists" is directly implying the assertion that he doesn't and thus is fabricated. It's literally crazy.
If you can draw a comic book character, you can invent complex biofeedback machines that read 4 streams of hard data to yield a subjective determination on a subjective statement run through any number of mental processes.
I don't see why one wouldn't give you all the skills for the other.
Come on man, I said "much". I'm aware of the history here.
Yes, but the point was that we don't really see much sign of it in the stars above, not that we've never observed it at all.
Not only have we created them, we have small stores at CERN and a few other facilities for experimentation on.
The summary makes mention that we haven't noted any substantial signs of this material, but how is that any different from, say, antimatter, which we know can exist?
Why would you need a group to help get more people who are already overrepresented into an industry.
This. Makes. No. Sense.
Oh, no, I wouldn't say that's a problem for a reversed situation either. The society of male nurses is mostly male, for example, because they're specifically addressing concerns of male nurses. There's a natural and not-fundamentally sexist reason for that divide to have some degree of existence.
People do have a need to be concerned with their own interests.
You accuse me of hypocrisy, when the reverse you assert is entirely within acceptable bounds of anyone who isn't a tremendous misandrist. The fact that hypermisogynisic assholes run rampant on slashdot is gravely concerning.
Now if it were, say, an industry, instead of a gender issues organization, that would be cause for alarm and serious work. The problem here is just sexist pretending to care about sexism. And nothing else.
"I don't care, but let me rationalize this out-of-nowhere accusation that makes no sense"
We'll have more information about the gravity attributes and locations of dark matter, but no deeper insight into how it connects to the physics we DO understand. I'm not trying to be a naysayer, I'm positively thrilled that we're going to find out what we can, but until we can get up close, and determine exactly what ways dark matter interacts with all other forces, its underlying nature will be a bit mysterious.
So, now it's a grand conspiracy to fabricate fictional men in order to discredit internet commenters.
Yep. That's sane.
And here come the MRAs with mod points, modding down facts because it's inconvenient.
"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain." -- G. Fitch