Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Right of first sale (Score 2, Informative) 295

Fair use for LPs:

Academic: Hell no
Parody: Nope, except in the rarest of cases
Commercial nature or is for nonprofit: quite clearly commercial
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole: usually they play through the whole game.
The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: Possibly detrimental

I don't see any path for fair use in there. It doesn't really meet any of the requirements.

Comment: Re:not a fan (Score 5, Insightful) 505

by i kan reed (#43756195) Attached to: Review: <em>Star Trek: Into Darkness</em>

Yeah, I know how you feel. Star Trek was a rare bastion of (semi)intellectualism on television, technobabble aside. To see all that removed in favor of violence, pretty colors, and snappy writing, makes me feel sort of depressed.

Of course, the reality is that everyone who likes the non-Abrams Trek's tone has options. The current incarnation of Doctor Who on BBC has exactly the same mix of high-concept, technobabble, silliness, and mystery uncovering plots that Star Trek used to have.

Comment: Re:I would love it if (Score 1) 197

Presumably "contempt of congress," a federal crime. Congressional inquiry is just a fancy way of saying "Bill of attainder" these days. Which is awful. The only time there was a serious attempt in congress to study something and get feedback that I can think of in the past couple decades was the 9/11 commission. And that was far from a success story.

"If you ever want to get anywhere in politics, my boy, you're going to have to get a toehold in the public eye."

Working...