About half of my answers come with Experts Exchange. Just scroll down to the bottom of the page if you don't feel like paying; all the answers are right there

That would be a significant deviation from today... how, exactly?

Some games and applications still make use of it. To be fair, though, I haven't found one that won't allow you to re-map the functionality.

I wish I had mod points to give you.

KVM? Diamond-O. It's because you have an extra modifier key to hide the buttons, not because you're an amazing "hacker." Laptops have been doing the same thing for years. If we added a few more of those super-special modifier keys, I think we could get the keyboard down to about 35 keys total. How does that sound?

ATP (cellular energy) is adenosine triphosphate. Arsenic generally works by reacting with this and, essentially, unplugging the fuel tank for cells.

Cops generally don't pat you down unless they think you've done something wrong.

Oh, the glory of hyperbole. Eh, Mr. Godwin?

OOh, I love picking your posts apart.

And the document begins with "We the People". Corporations are things not people, so the Bill of Rights applies to the People alone, and the Member States that made the original document.
Point 1: Read further: "We the People ... do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." That sentence is stating that the people are establishing the constitution, not limits on who/what it applies to.
Point 2: Corporations are legal entities that have been ruled to have many of the same legal rights and protections as an individual. If you think otherwise, get yourself a seat on a court and change it.
Point 3: You state that it only applies to the "Member States" that made the original document. There were only twelve "Member States" when the Constitution was ratified in 1789. So sorry, the rest of you 38 states?

Corporations have no more rights than this Building I am sitting in
Yes they do. Go learn some corporate law. Here's a starting place, although you should probably delve into more authoritative sources

and are in fact an invention by government (via issuance of a Limited Liability) that do not exist in nature.
Yes, they are an invention of the government. So is criminal law. So is the Constitution. Neither of those exist in nature, do they? I haven't seen any Constitution trees in my parts.

I couldn't agree more. This is no different than standing on the street with a tape recorder. They were driving down public roadways, listening to public radio signals that hit their vehicle. Where's the violation?

I believe that government agencies generally file suit on behalf of whistleblowers, discrimination victims, et cetera if they believe that the case has merit. You're still up the fecal river if you need immediate cash, though.

Censorship does not equal violation of the first amendment. They are two completely separate but related concepts.

There is a distinction that is made. If you speak disloyally (defame the company without sufficient evidence or basis in fact), then you're on your own. If you act as a whistleblower and bring up legitimate complaints that are provable then you're generally "protected", whatever that's worth.

The summary is wrong. They haven't really ruled anything, the NLRB is taking it to court and fighting it. Also, the NLRB is contesting it on the basis of a violation of firing in retaliation to protected speech, not for a lack of cause. If the speech is disloyal or not a discussion between employees, they don't really have a case through the NLRA.

You're describing an at-will state, not a right to work state. Right to work means that you can't be forced to join a union as a condition of employment, with exceptions for some specific industries such as railroads. At-will means that the employer or employee can terminate a non-contracted employment relationship at any time, with or without cause.