Obviously the TLC NAND is named for the Tender Loving Care you need to give it during use.
I think the Slack Lazy Careless stuff is more robust.
I can't afford the $250,000 it would cost to patent ONE thing.
So no - the patent system is for the wealthy.
Only if you say strike earth (as in earth being dirt), however in terms of the biosphere we call earth - they both hit earth.
One of course doesn't reach the surface of the earth, as it burns up in the atmosphere of the earth.
I sense a pedant in the wings.
When in the field, a soldier gets stressed out - sure, however they get to use much of the innate stress mechanisms humans and animals have of fight or flight.
When sitting behind a computer screen in an air conditioned office - much of the stress is still there however there is no mechanism for management.
Just ask an air traffic controller if they think their job is easy - now compound that by actually having to kill people.
Personally - I think these guys probably don't need medals, they probably need lots of counselling.
They will only be screwed if they pay you use fees.
Other than that, they legally wont be allowed to be screwed.
The fact that so much of the world has so little understanding of science, that they feel the choice is between belief in religion and belief in science.
I'd much prefer a world where belief was protected over in one corner, and knowledge was protected over in the other - and the population as a whole understood the difference.
How would you realistically track our societies on this path ?
I know it is in Australia (ACCC).... would have thought US had more protection.
My GPA was just over 5, does that help ?
Would it help if I said we scored 1.0 -> 7.0 on our results in Australia ? (+/- 3SD)
Sounds like you have the resources.
Some don't.
> This is something I don't understand.
Not everyone has the resources to live their life as they choose, those people are probably spending 60-80% of their time in front of a computer to earn money to eat or pay medical bills.
Just because you were lucky enough to have a good life, doesn't mean everyone is.
What I don't understand is how people see their sample size of one, and draw a line of obviousness through it.
My calculations would say it probably went at a speed of around 0km/second, placing it now around 0km from Earth after 5 years.
You can automatically judge reviewers of large numbers of book by determining how well their reviews fall into a normal distribution.
That is - from a individual's subjective opinion, after reading 1000 books - should form a roughly normal distribution (the worst, the best etc).
So you weight a person's contribution to the overall score by their fit to the normal distribution on their own reviews and the number of reviews they have made.
A rough approximation for the purposes of a 5 star score is 1: 5%, 2: 15%, 3:60%, 4: 15%, 5: 5%. Of course these numbers could be adjusted to allow for equal numbers in each group if they wanted.
Of course it matters which was which, the Shadows had way cooler stuff.
Business is a good game -- lots of competition and minimum of rules. You keep score with money. -- Nolan Bushnell, founder of Atari
