Comment Re:Guilty conscience? (Score 1) 790
The moral argument is this. Money indirectly represent resources. Buying expensive toys is wasting disproportionate amount of said resources on yourself, excluding the others. We have words for that - egoism, and egotism.
And then
...Now there's a line to draw, obviously. Where you draw that is subjective - some people believe that buying an iPhone is highly immoral when there are e.g. starving people in Africa. I don't buy into that, among other things, because I don't believe in non-starving Africa in foreseeable future no matter the resources spent on that
So basically you draw the line when you can afford it and you call it a waste of money when you can't.
IPhone is your own form of luxury (or a similar product) , you don't need it, you know the price is ridiculously high. There are many phones with similar features costing half the price. But you want it.
Such kind of cars mean roughly 0.00001% of the whole car's market. I bet that Iphone sales in absolute term means more waste than Bugatti sales. So if you are really serious about waste, first ban Iphones.