So he doesn't want to ban encryption only useful, working encryption? Not sure that really changes anything.
As far as I can tell, he's not talking about banning anything.
Logically your alternative doesn't work - if I die and the password dies with me then SS can't read the communication.
If there's nobody alive who can read the encrypted message then nobody gives a damn what's in the message. The message effectively no longer exists.
But I should point out, this is not a law. This is not a bill.It's not a manifesto promise, or a promise of any sort. It's not policy. It's not even a pledge. It's a statement of intent in a speech. That's all! Attempting to fathom out exactly what the law's full implications will be from a vague speech is pointless. There isn't a law!
And why should I care?
No idea. Perhaps you don't. If you're into 3D graphics then you will care. If you don't care then that's up to you. The implication here that we think you should care is a little childish. If you don't care that's fine. Find something you do care about.
Does this do tile-based rendering?
I presume you intended this as a joke, but from the OpenGL/Vulkan comparison table in the overview:
"Matches architecture of modern platforms
including mobile platforms with unified memory, tiled rendering"
On that point - I'm not all that sure exactly what it does to support tiling. The PowerVR blog says "A render pass consists of framebuffer state (other than actual render target addresses), and how render targets should be loaded in and out of the GPU at the start and end of each render. This structure is the key object that allows tiled architectures like PowerVR to run at extremely high efficiency." but that it's not really all that clear to me how this makes a difference.
The question of whether computers can think is just like the question of whether submarines can swim. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra