No such thing. As the phrase goes, Yale men, Princeton boys, and Harvard scholars.
Or "going bubble" when someone cannot pass certain section.
I think you mean "bubbling up." (At least that's the term we somehow latched onto.)
...or anyone that does data entry for a living, where all-caps is the standard.
I have some of this (or an identical competitor), and it works just fine.
Did you read the rest of my post (the part that you didn't quote) where I addressed the actions that they should take, instead of just turning off autoreply?
Your tone seems to be that of disagreement, but your words recapitulate what I already said.
Regardless of the information density of his post, I disagree with his assertion that Hotmail should flip the 'autoreply' bit on these accounts. I do not think Hotmail wants to get involved in guessing whether or not someone intended to set any particular auto-reply message: "Surely, Mr. Jones, you didn't intend to drop an F-bomb in your auto-reply."
More to the point, these are hacked accounts. If you were going to take any action, *disabling* (even temporarily) the accounts and flagging them for forensic follow-up would strike me as more appropriate.
Your point is supported by the fact that the Christmas terrorist was the son of a banker, and well-educated. This is not someone who spent a life in poverty.
This is the correct response. Facebook use (and actively develop) APC, an opcode cache. In other words, they cache the compiled binaries created by PHP. So, the environmental impact of running PHP as opposed to something compiled is virtually 0, because nearly all calls are made to pre-compiled PHP opcode.
I clicked the "get add-ons" on the welcome screen and it only gave two options (URL fixer and some location add-on).
Those are add-ons recommended by Mozilla. This page implies that there are 726 total add-ons for Mobile, with AdBlock Plus here.
"It says he made us all to be just like him. So if we're dumb, then god is dumb, and maybe even a little ugly on the side." -- Frank Zappa