That doesn't make the two statements (yours and the quoted law) synonymous. You said the distinction was down to someone going nude in order to shock and intimidate, which is not the same as simply knowing that you are likely to affront or alarm.
The last sentence should have said "public nudity is LEGAL" in Washington
I found this:
(1) A person is guilty of indecent exposure if he or she intentionally makes any open and obscene exposure of his or her person or the person of another knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm.
which seems not to indicate that "the exception is when a person is nude for the purposes of shock or intimidation."
"knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront" seems likely to cover most cases of public nudity.
Here is one definition of a general-purpose processor: if it can run any algorithm, then it is general purpose. This is not a particularly interesting definition, because it ignores the performance aspect that has been the driving goal for most processor development.
Well, I'm sorry you don't find the definition interesting, but that doesn't mean you can redefine it however you want.
It's therefore not enough for a processor to be Turing complete in order to be classified as general purpose; it must be able to run all programs efficiently.
I assume there's a name for a logical fallacy where you redefine terms in order to make your point.
With this in mind, let's explore what people really mean when they refer to a general-purpose processor: the specific category of workloads that these devices are optimized for and what those optimizations are.
That's not what I mean when I refer to a general-purpose processor.
Efficient designs in such a world will require admitting that there is no one-size-fits-all processor design and that there is a large spectrum, with different trade-offs at different points.
I didn't realise anyone was denying this.
Proof that the earth is flat is something we also had
What meaning of the word "proof" is that, then?
Okay, affect/effect, not a huge deal other than making Slashdot look amateurish, but there's a plural "s" missing after "attacker" which makes it sound like there's just one person they're after.
back v. walk or drive backwards
Also "discovered" and "be" are there, if I was being pedantic about "no verb."
You
Are
Not
Alone
The Jedi were cool and popular and mysterious. Once you got to see them in council meetings... well, takes a bit of the mystique out of it.
if you think I'm going to watch him do it to Star Wars as well, you're sorely mistaken.
That's okay then. I've never given a moment's thought to what you think.
When is Seaquest coming back?
It seems bazaar
Market up to a lack of common sense.
Michael Litos and his team were able to accelerate bunches of electrons to near the speed of light
"Near the speed of light" is not a particularly informative phrase when you're talking about particle colliders.
90%? 99%? 99.9999%?
Composed on the spot in all of five minutes.
I'd never have guessed.
I think the standard objection to that idea is that there'd have to be so many/much of them/it that we'd have seen them by now.
Eh, my other reply was probably off the mark. Too early.
Anyway, yes, exactly like that cop. He's exactly the sort (assuming he didn't have some reason you weren't aware of for doing what he did) who can benefit from this project.
Many people are unenthusiastic about their work.
