For me, dropping it 3ft onto a plastic floor, while it was in a rubber case.
We're still in the stone age with glass strength.

I don't know, I think there might be something to the idea that people so desperate to see a movie they'd assault their eyes with a garbage cam rip rather than wait a couple weeks/months for a DVD or HD pirate copy to come out might very well pay.

There's a fucking huge difference between "this book is racist, you shouldn't publish it and people shouldn't buy it!" and "We're banning these books by law, enforced by armed agents of the state forcing compliance."
Don't equate these two. They're not the fucking same. Funny how all these idiots who think it is the same invariably vote right, almost like they're just looking for any ill informed excuse to justify their bullshit.

'AMAZING 4K HDR DOLBY VISION ATMOS 29721917 channel sound!'
Stream size: 2GB.
4k BD-remuxes of similar length TV shows: 15-50GB.

Looking at you, Disney+. They're the worst offender. Netflix actually used to offer BD quality streams if your device and connection could handle it. They've since cut it in half. Probably more, last I checked was when ST3 came out.
Netflix is also surprisingly strong on DRM now too. Only the very most popular shows get their 4k versions decrypted (vs ripped from HDMI streams), and it takes months sometimes. Apparently apart from the technical difficulty, you need an nVidia Shield to do it, and it gets banned after 1-2 episodes. So a lot like the DeNuvo situation with games (only worse since you don't need to keep burning $200 hardware devices).

If you really want to... Windows lets me use a driver I wrote in VB6. 32bit Windows 10, obviously, but I did compile the same code to x64 with twinBASIC (backwards compatible with VB6) and use it on 64bit Windows 10.
Of course it comes at a cost. Your 16-bit driver for NT4 likely isn't signed, so you have to disable driver signing globally to use it, and do so every boot because that can't be set to always do it. There's an extremely elaborate workaround if you have Enterprise or Education Windows for self-signing. But that's just as painful as hardware on linux at that point.

I see yet another person who hasn't actually read Nicol's ridiculous decision... he his reasons for dismissing all of his witnesses and evidence while crediting all of hers were a farce or non-existent. Her on tape admitting she was hitting him? Well, she denied it in court, so he credits her saying she didn't over audio recordings saying she did. You're going to tell me that's sound logic? The UK has a well known issue with bias against foreigners suing UK-based corporations.
You're full of shit if you think it's easy to win a defamation of a public figure case in the US. It's a massive uphill battle. It's the exact opposite of what you claim. Celebrities bringing defamation actions can almost never win because of the actual malice standard; they have to prove that not only was it a lie, the person *knew* it was a lie. There's a very clear reason why she lost with a unanimous jury verdict here, but got one very clearly biased judge to believe her in the UK, and it's not because a jury full of people all just loved one celebrity so much more than the other they decided to ignore the evidence. How do you in good conscience make such a ridiculous claim to defend and abusive piece of shit?
Oh right, you're so far off the deep end you take 'beleive all women' literally, where no amount of evidence is ever sufficient to convince you one might be lying about this sort of thing. You might claim otherwise, but when *even this case* isn't enough for you to conclude it's a lie, and you can point to no other where you disbelieved a woman, that's clearly either a lie to us or a lie to yourself. Just like her 'expert' witness... "I've worked on thousands of DV cases" "Have you *ever* found a instance where an adult male was the victim of an adult female?" "Look! Squirrel!" (she evaded giving a straight answer, it was obvious).
For fuck sake dude, did you listen to any of the audio? Listen to her describe having Depp on top of her pounding her head into the bed, ripping her hair out, splitting her lip open, etc, only to show up the next day without a mark on her and able to move flawlessly and open her mouth for a nice wide smile that would be impossible to do with a recently split lip? Did you notice how the photos of the chunks of hair that supposedly got ripped out leaving her scalp bloody magically had not a single root pulling out, rendering that claim in defiance of simple physics?

You're defending someone who's unquestionable not only the perpetrator of a DV hoax, but was in fact the abuser herself. It's just as disgusting as the asshats who defend men accused of these things. That's how you're spending Christmas. Posting ignorant defenses of abusers on Slashdot.

They pushed back the release date so it wouldn't be so close in the headlines to Amber Heard's court loss for lying about who was the domestic abuser in her relationship (no easy feat, given she went so far as to wear fake bruises and give TMZ a very misleadingly edited video; and defamation cases by public figures are a massive uphill battle in the US)... and there's pretty solid reason to think the studio was bankrolling her massive post-trial PR blitz of making shit up about why she lost given the judgement against her and insurance looking to get out of paying since intentional torts usually aren't covered.
Seems they neglected the most important part of making a movie with an abusive herself court-proven domestic abuse hoax perpetrator succeed; it can't suck. And now it's shitting the bed like one of it's characters; can't wait to see how they'll also try to blame the tiny, tiny dog for the massive human-sized shit.
Maybe it's misogyny to not believe believe women even after the immense weight of evidence leading to defamation liability finding against a public figure based on an op-ed the ACLU shamefully had lawyers try to weasel word out of legally being libel?

Even if the US and EU stopped, a lot of the rest of the world wouldn't. It's just wishful thinking, not a practical solution to the problem.
I also feel this way about climate change. Whatever the risks of geoengineering, it's clear that's the only way we're not hurtling straight into a worst case scenario. Because if you believe India et al when they say "Ok, we'll pollute as much as we can for a few decades and then stop, just to make up for the unfairness of you guys getting to", I have a bridge to sell you.

This just simply isn't true. They're not uncrackable safes... they government can absolutely get their contents. But the contents are encoded. The Founders were absolutely not strangers to secret code ciphers for protecting the contents of documents, indeed many of them used such techniques. There was zero expectation the government would always be able to decrypt the documents they seized, since while almost all of those techniques are crackable with computers now, they weren't back then.

Old man obsessed with ancient fairy tales has bad take on modern technology. Shocking.

My mom is in her 70s; she hates the automated voice shit. It will be 10 seconds before she's screaming "HUMAN! CUSTOMER SERVICE! PERSON! OPERATOR! NO! NO! NO! PERSON!" at it like every phone call to many companies these days.

Don't worry, I'm sure you'll add antivax beliefs to your repertoire of deluded conspiracy theories eventually.

You claim that in theory, but in practice, you clearly listen to anyone who says the people following that method are lying, and adopt whatever contrarian view suits your belief, finding the outlier views and results that support your beliefs over a fair reading of the weight of the evidence. That's not "real science", "real data", or "the Scientific method". You're just yet another right wing conspiracy nut who can't admit it to themselves so say you're a libertarian with false objectivity.

It's a testament to the effectiveness of right wing propaganda that people think Trump isn't, at a minimum, as senile and addled as Biden. There's many more quotes as bad as the above. Go on, tell me with a straight fucking face Trump isn't duller than Biden, especially when 90% of what you idiots claim is senility is just Biden's lifelong stuttering and foot-in-mouth problem. If Biden isn't aware he's wearing pants, Trump isn't aware what year it is, where he is, or capable of doing anything besides being a babbling incoherent moron.
Nothing more reliable than conservatives and projection. Trump is dangerously senile, therefore you falsely claim Biden is.

Yes there is, because nudity and pornography are already legally distinguished. There's sites on the clearnet that exploit this distinction; there's nudist colonies/resorts where families of all age compositions go. Pictures from there of people going about normal mundane activities aren't illegal, even when of children. But people aren't visiting these photo repositories for their pictures of 70+ year olds, even though they have those too for plausible deniability.
You've heard of Game of Thrones, right? Nobody is in prison right now for owning a copy of the Season 1 episode that shows a bunch of fully naked toddlers running around outside Little Finger's brothel, nor are the show crew for filming it.

The same would apply to AI images of violence. Also, plenty of people enjoy watching actual, real violence, on which there's no legal restrictions. Some very sick people are watching all the videos legally available of children being beaten, killed, and mutilated... as long as their genitals aren't showing, because that would be over the line for ...reasons.