Oh, cool. Then I guess you missed where they noted that
But Eiss also indicated he might find it sufficient to review a paper copy of the code, as needed, at a library.
White said copies of the code, with updates early this year, are on file at the Schenectady Public Library, Schenectady County Supreme Court Library, the Schenectady County Community College Library and several other locations.
No, it seems you don't think that documents can be available if not on the Internet. Hint: how do you think mankind has published laws so far? And how could you get a copy of your local code of law until now? And what do you think is stopping you from doing so? And what part of 'will be available for free after the work is done' did you not understand?
If you want, right now, the package of laws as they offer it, you pay that price. How is that different from the bookseller offering the code as a book and charging for it?
Furthermore, from the article:
But Eiss also indicated he might find it sufficient to review a paper copy of the code, as needed, at a library.
White said copies of the code, with updates early this year, are on file at the Schenectady Public Library, Schenectady County Supreme Court Library, the Schenectady County Community College Library and several other locations.
What part of '[the laws will] be made available on the Web for free" didn't you understand?
I assume the normal means of studying the laws of Schenectady are still available.
The parent should be modded -1 Stupid.
As they say: "Get a brain, morans!"
I think the article meant the ads that are actually in Times Square. You know, on the buildings.
way to read the article, moron, the new site is a service you rent to create a specific q&a site around your own interest.
Because hiring _good_ developers is otherwise inexpensive, right?
You could also incorporate 'experience working with design patterns' into the interview process. Just a thought.
You could also hire better new developers. Or at least, ones that have design patterns experience.
So you mean the problem is _less serious_ by the fact that it's been on _more_ Windows versions than stated? Maybe you mean that MS has said 'it's not a problem because this and that?'
From actually reading the post you answered to, what I wrote extrapolates quite easily. Reread the first and third paragraphs of the GP's post.
You answered a post that talks about piracy being the main argument for bnetd, and wonder why I bring the point forward to your comment? And suddenly it's my reading comprehension that's crooked?
It was a fairly nice attempt at changing the argument discussed and appear less dickish, but it ultimately failed.
Its funny how, if you replace Blizzard with 'the music industry', bnetd for BitTorrent and games for music, your post reads exactly like what RIAA execs often say.
Yet, since it goes in benefit of WoW's papa instead of the guys behind Britney, you get modded up instead of down as you deserve. Shameful, both for you in particular and for Slashdot in general.
A lot more people think the same way about music, not only the RIAA execs. If you feel that the boneheadedness from the RIAA gives you an excuse to pirate music, you have a very crooked moral and ethic system. Plus, you understand jack about modern justice. That you feel that this opinion ought to be downmodded just shows you're a dick.
it's homophone, not homonym (things that sound the same, not things that are named the same).
You mean the 'good programmer reading client's spec' decompiler?
Another question asked was if the Windows in question was legit - Yes, I bought him a OEM XP the last time I was there and installed it.
Ahem. You're not supposed to do that. That's not what one calls 'a legit Windows install'. Or am I confused? I thought OEM can't be bought separately from computers.
It is better to live rich than to die rich. -- Samuel Johnson
