Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Slashdot creates beta site users express theirs dislike (slashdot.org) 4

who_stole_my_kidneys writes: Slashdot started redirecting users in February to its newly revamped webpage and received a huge backlash from users. The majority of comments dislike the new site while some do offer solutions to make it better. The question is will Slashdot force the unwanted change on its users that clearly do not want change?

Submission + - Once Slashdot beta has been foisted upon me, what site should I use instead? 2

somenickname writes: As a long time Slashdot reader, I'm wondering what website to transition to once the beta goes live. The new beta interface seems very well suited to tablets/phones but, it ignores the fact that the user base is, as one would expect, nerds sitting in front of very large LCD monitors and wasting their employers time. It's entirely possible that the browser ID information gathered by the site has indicated that they get far more hits on mobile devices where the new interface is reasonable but, I feel that no one has analyzed the browser ID (and screen resolution) against comments modded +5. I think you will find that most +5 comments are coming from devices (real fucking computers) that the new interface does not support well. Without an interface that invites the kind of users that post +5 comments, Slashdot is just a ho-hum news aggregation site that allows comments. So, my question is, once the beta is the default, where should Slashdot users go to?

Submission + - Slashdot beta sucks 9

An anonymous reader writes: Maybe some of the slashdot team should start listening to its users, most of which hate the new user interface. Thanks for ruining something that wasn't broken.

Comment Re:[OT] beta.slashdot.org (Score 1) 94

Maybe I'm doing it wrong. Use a nice clean fresh browser, no cookies, no history and log into Slashdot. From a clean start (ie not having logged in before, and with no cookies etc) I can't get to classic. Yeah I can add a URL trailer, but really, if my prefs say "Classic" I'm not sure whay, on log on, I don't automatically get that.

Comment [OT] beta.slashdot.org (Score 4, Insightful) 94

Seriously /. - fuck you! If I go to slashdot.org you redirect me to beta.slashdot.org. If I go to classic.slashdot.org, you redirect me to beta.slashdot.org. If I log in, you redirect me to beta.slashdot.org.

I freaking HATE beta.slashdot.org and I resent your pushing me into it! If I log in, and my preferences are set to classic, LET ME HAVE CLASSIC!

Comment It's not binary (Score 1) 628

Why do some people seem to care more about the death of 200,000 Syrians than the death of 500,000 Iraqis? It's a crap argument - you're saying that because people have picked issue A as being worthy of their support over (or perhaps even as well as) issue B, and Issue B is in your view more important than issue A, that caring about issue A is somehow insupportable.

Comment Survivalist instinct (Score 1) 628

This rhetorical device - that it's ok to do x because x is natural - is called an "Appeal to Nature". At base, it argues that because something's natural, it's good. You can use it to justify all sorts of things - rape, murder, sticking your dick into anything that moves - all manner of things. One of the nice things about being human is that we're now in a position to choose whether or not to live by following our natural desires. And in many cases, we've chosen not to - we sanction against rape, murder etc, and many, many cultures, we eschew eating meat. So the argument really isn't whether we should eat meat because it's "natural" to do so, but rather, given we don't really need to, should we eat meat. "we should eat meat because it's 'natural' to" isn't really much of an argument.

Comment Guns don't kill people (Score 3, Interesting) 514

Most of the comments on this article seem to be against this which is interesting, because every time an article about gun control gets posted, the highest rating comments are overwhelmingly from gun advocates, often with the argument that "guns don't kill people, people kill people". Whats the difference here? Surely robots don't kill people, people kill people?

Comment And you're an asshole (Score 3, Informative) 234

In a perfect world we'd all be able to have jobs that didn't piss you off. Sadly, we don't live in that world and there are some people who have to take the only job that's available to them, and in some cases, that jobs going to be a job that consists of annoying you. When the alternative's starvation, any job's a good one. You're an asshole because you're advocating making life even shittier for people who may have no choice in doing the job they do.

Slashdot Top Deals

If the aborigine drafted an IQ test, all of Western civilization would presumably flunk it. -- Stanley Garn

Working...