Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hey, credit due... (Score 1) 122

China along with Russia will want Trump only because he will pretty much end NATO allow allow Russia to take over Ukraine. That alone will be enough to hurt the US a lot. Then the next step for China would be Taiwan.

You could just as easily make the argument that OPEC has the ability to manipulate our elections in such a manner, too. Biden is really concerned that high gas prices might hurt his reelection chances, even to the point that he's considering tapping the strategic petroleum reserve again. Funny how nobody ever wants to suggest banning foreign oil, though...

Comment Re:Rebecca Watson on YouTube made a good point (Score 1) 122

Why should US residents be denied access to foreign speech when they could not be denied access (due to the First Amendment) to that same speech if it were domestically generated?

Except that TikTok isn't even analogous to a foreign broadcaster broadcasting foreign speech. TikTok's US content largely consists of videos produced by American creators. The potential ban would deplatform an entire social media network of American users. How the free speech implications of such an action managed to slip past the minds of so many elected representatives, is a truly disturbing revelation.

Comment Re:Rebecca Watson on YouTube made a good point (Score 1) 122

which is that this doesn't solve anything. If China wants to manipulate us they can do it like Russia does with troll & bot farms.

That's because it's not really about foreign manipulation. It's that Meta and YouTube's short format offerings aren't as popular with the young kids, and they see a potential future where something like WeChat comes along and dethrones them in other aspects of the social media sphere as well.

Nobody wants to be the next "MySpace", and these days the established social media players spend enough lobbying money to make sure that never happens, so they can keep legally buying up domestic competitors, and getting any foreign competitors banned (or bought out - hey - it's even in the damn bill!). It's so blatantly corrupt.

Comment Re:Honestly, Tiktok isn't the problem (Score 1) 122

No, the issue is that it's a propaganda and intelligence harvesting tool for the Chinese, who don't happen to be our friends.

Last I checked, there's still "Made in China" ibuprofen at Walmart. So, we're trusting them to manufacture our drugs but can't trust them with a short form video smartphone app? I think we've got our priorities backwards.

 

Comment Re:Honestly, Tiktok isn't the problem (Score 3, Interesting) 122

People need to be aware of this, normally I would be against banning ticktock, but since China blocks many US Sites, I am all for it.

Okay, so now America has a "great firewall", just like China. Who gets to decide what goes on the blocklist? The party currently in power. Sooner or later, that'll be the team you're not rooting for and they might want to ban something you actually like.

Therein lies the problem.

Comment Re:GOP Donor Jeff Yass (Score 1) 122

I eventually unblocked TikTok from my home router once I was certain my teen wasn't drowning in the super toxic crap there but if TikTok went away she's not in a position to punish any elected official for it and I'm certainly not doing it for her by proxy with my vote.

(emphasis mine)

You're not doing it by proxy with your vote even if you wanted to, because both candidates are firmly on the "China = bad" bandwagon.

Comment Re:Rebecca Watson on YouTube made a good point (Score 1) 122

TikTok itself is banned inside China. Many western social media and news organizations are also banned there. The precedence is already there.

That's not really the flex you imagine it to be. China bans western social media apps because they believe it is a corrupting influence on their populace. Or, in other words, their government sees the citizens in much the same way as a parent sees their immature children.

Comment Re:Hey, credit due... (Score 2) 122

TT will still be fully able to affect and sway this years election.

Don't worry, I'm sure the affect will be cancelled out by Russia's meddling on our domestic social media networks. Besides, what's China gonna do anyway, convince people to vote for the anti-China candidate or the anti-China candidate? Yeah, I do realize Trump now claims to have had a change of heart about TikTok, but I think that's mostly just because he hates the idea of Biden getting credit for something he tried to do first.

Comment Re:do not want (Score 1) 204

Once the cost of a battery pack reaches the cost of a rebuilt/replacement engine or transmission then things have reached parity as those are pretty analogous in terms of labor effort to swap, I expect that in the next 5-ish years.

Tell me you've never actually swapped an engine or transmission without telling me you've never actually swapped an engine or transmission. The bulk of the process of swapping a battery on a Chevy Bolt is physically moving the very heavy battery packs around. There certainly are some specific tools needed to swap a battery (again, mostly due to it being a big heavy unwieldy thing), but otherwise it is a lot less labor intensive of a process than swapping an engine or transmission.

The main reason a new EV battery is expensive is the cost of the replacement battery itself.

Comment Re:do not want (Score 0) 204

All that time I have been convinced that the capitalist system is the best system to provide for the needs of people and just let the market do the work.

And when the capitalist system decides that it's more profitable just to sell $50k gas guzzlers, because fuck everyone who needs something more affordable or better for the environment, then what?

If you really think capitalism can always do no wrong, then you should take a long hard look at freemium gaming, too. Sometimes the absolute quest for maximum profit leads to an absolutely terrible result. Capitalism requires a certain amount of regulation, otherwise it can easily turn just as foul as other *isms.

Comment Re:do not want (Score 1) 204

Yeah, it seems EV owner has always wither bought every lemon in the world, or bought into the fact that they need to take the car back to the dealer at every "scheduled maintenance".

I've got two EVs in my household and don't know what the OP was on about with maintenance costs. Fuel savings absolutely is where you see your ROI, especially with longer commutes.

Oil changes have always been cheap if you do them yourself, so I've never considered that to be a major expense of owning an ICE vehicle. It's an unpleasant and messy job if you're not the type who actually enjoys working on vehicles, but it's not expensive. Both types of vehicles need tires, and realistically you'll go through tires slightly faster in an EV, but last time I did the math on it, it's roughly about what you're saving on not needing oil changes, so it's a wash.

Comment Re:Screw the American auto industry (Score 1) 305

The US auto industry competes just fine at building what Americans want to drive.

Yeah, they're catering almost exclusively to people who have $50k to spend (likely bought on credit) and who also don't mind dumping an extra $150-$200/mo into gas.

There are many people without that sort of budget who still need a set of wheels. I suspect cheap Chinese EVs would sell very well here, and US automakers are rightfully spooked.

Slashdot Top Deals

Life is a whim of several billion cells to be you for a while.

Working...