Yes, this so called news can come back when android surpasses win as a 100% work environment

And as always we are are talking about the average Li-ion battery

And yet you say you modified it to be able to withstand those conditions, thus you don't have a standard Li-ion were the standard recommendations apply.

Exactly this, whatever if they had raised, lowered or stayed the same 0 wage is still lower than paying someone 1 dollar an hour

Yes, but here we are talking about working conditions, Li-ion is set to work for discharge up to minus 20 degrees, but for charging it is not recommended to do that in less than 0, you can but it will damage the battery more than usual, thus working conditions would be above 0 if you factor in both things. My guess by the statement of the researcher is that with this technology it might be safe to charge it to -20.

I hope there will be a adblock against that

*below 0 degress as slashdot doesn't support "less than" because if tags

Considered only lead acid are recommended to be used/work in 0

It is when the current charging recommendation is >0 for LI-ion so anything below is extreme for LI-ion.

No it is about the article headline in / linked is saying, we created a ai that thought itself (let say drive a car that it is very impressive) and roflstotemped every opponent (but uf you read the article they state) but we also gave it a 20% faster car so it won every time

All that a government might want to do something about in the future, don't just think about the us where the gov already have their people's asses

At least you know you have it there, would be more of problem if you didn't know

Just because you are a basement dweller whos only 5 min of fame will come when they remove your fat body from the basement using a crane, I haven't seen any complete clip of him but know about him, news about someone using and getting famous by a Internet medium is nice

Saying something anti cp seems always to be like spot the vegan, instead here you get the pedophile

Aint laundering money that you have obtained money illegally and try to make it legit, that the money is from frauds is a completely different thing.
I dont know what the law says but it is probably that they didnt take enough information from the people sending money and that they didnt check the ones receiving it, basically didnt take valid ID's on the sender or reciever, can be also that they failed to report to the government that person or wu office X was sending/receiving Y money(if there are limits when they have to report that) within a certain period of time.