If you poke a bear cub with a stick long enough, its mom might come and maul the shit out of you.
Yeah... you do know that bears are not people, right? We generally try to hold Muslims to higher standards than we do bears.
Or Pro-Lifers. Yes, all of them, because all Muslims raided Charlie Hebdo.
>. If the trap captures the first ant, it won't be able to capture many more ants later.
I wish all people were as smart as this plant.
I hope more people would be so smart as not to listen to life tips by people who accredit "smarts" to a plant. That's just bananas.
You might like the second sentence of the article:
things that were new to x86 were old hat to supercomputing, mainframe, and workstation folks.
Just curious, did you read one sentence of the article before commenting on it?
At least he didn't stop at "asked" and immediately fired off a diatribe against Ask Slashdot.
The sea level rise is probably the best thing to talk about. From what I've seen of the data, we're looking at about 2 mm per year throughout most of the world right now. At that rate, we're looking at about 7 inches per 100 years. At that rate, it is hard to argue we have a problem.
Yeah it's really hard to argue with someone who ignores that the sea level rise is accelerating and pretends he can do linear extrapolation. An easy way to tell it's accelerating is that the actual rise is 3 mm / year, not your old value.
Nature has been known to sometimes print dodgy articles, so you'll need to get more verification before making a claim, search for "Nature magazine controversies"
It's not so much that the article is dodgy, more that what Tony Wazzup tells him the article says is dodgy. Which is a total surprise. Not.
Something isn't right here. Google can and does patch older versions of Android via the Play store app, which can patch the system.
That only can patch APIs, not anything in the kernel. The only thing not right here is your Fandroidish "Google can do no wrong".
Funny, this article is by a climate scientist.
Karmashock is just trying to misdirect by pointing fingers at unrelated political arguments to create FUD and guilt by association. All of which are decidedly political tactics.
"Advice"...? Not so much.
Well, his advice is to tell people you love guns. Maybe Mann should just threaten to shoot some deniers to change their minds?
Oops, forgot to add:
talk to someone that wins. Talk to Bill Clinton.
Bubba torpedoed Hillary's last campaign. He's not a winner anymore.
-jcr
LOL are you really sure about that ?
I am pretty sure it keeps him the winner in his home, and about the last thing he wants is a president Hillary.
Why - that would be the best way to keep her off his back.
So are you saying U.S. soldiers did nothing wrong when they raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires to human genitals, cut off limbs, blew up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages, and poisoned food stocks?
Or are you saying it's wrong, but we shouldn't talk about it?
Well, of course it's wrong to talk about it, it stops the people the soldiers doing those things to love the soldiers. How can we win the hearts and souls of people if they know the soldiers will cut them out to do the winning?
Here ya go.
http://www.wintersoldier.com/i...
It is well known that John Kerry testified against the Vietnam war in a congressional hearing. This link is the second one found by google.
I'm not saying anything one way or the other but him speaking out against the war is a well known thing.
Well, John Kerry was also a soldier - so when you say him testifying against the Vietnam war means he "vilified soldiers and was anti-military", he was the equivalent of the "self-hating jew" as far as Vietnam goes.
The vilification of Michael Mann and others like Phil Jones has come to be called the Serengeti strategy. In the Serengeti lions will try to separate one individual from the herd in order to make them easier to take down. Climate science deniers think that taking down one individual like Michael Mann will destroy the entire edifice of climate science but like in the Serengeti the herd still exists. The strategy won't work until they can take out the whole herd.
Their strategy is denying the heard exists. Case closed.
Not true. A meme that has been produced that M&M cherry-picked runs but nothing in the peer-reviewed literature.
Steve McIntyre has written extensively on this canard.
tl;dr It's simply untrue.
Well, if you don't use the statistical method Mann used "wrong", you still come up with the hockey stick, so the "right" way M&M used it can't have been right, now can it? And that's even when you deny the existence of peer-reviewed destructions of M&M's paper. But then you will deny the facts too, won't you.
They are serious allegations. They might also be correct as well.
Coming from a guy with a biography at IMDB? Sure.
Part of doing good science is being exceedingly critical of your own work.
So the only way of being a true scientist is to let random idiots insult you? Is that how deniers define science now?
If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.
