Get into work early. Seriously. Often I am the first one in the office. Before I sit down I do some stretches and deep knee bends. Then some upper body stretches for the shoulders and neck. Stretch out your calves as well. I can do all of this before anyone else gets in.

Try and do this a few times a day. Drink lots of water rather than soda. Not only will you consume fewer calories but it will give you an excuse to go to the bathroom more often. Resist the urge to eat lunch at your desk. If you go out for lunch then park a bit further so you have to walk a bit. Take the stairs rather than the elevator. I love it when I go to big meetings and there are not enough chairs. I'm the first one to stand.

The bottom line is that you can't always count on your employer. If you do some of the things above it might help. At the very least, you'll feel better.

Thanks for the tip. I honestly didn't know what that Memory Pleasure thing was all about. I feel better about the memory usage now.

I've got a 2009 era MacBook Pro. Originally it ran Snow Leopard but since then I have upgraded OS's as they came out and now I'm on Yosemite. One thing I have noticed is that memory requirements have steadily gone up. At the moment I'm running an email client, Skype, Chrome and a password manager and it's using over 6GB of RAM. The same thing on Windows 8 uses less than 4GB of RAM. On Linux it's about 2.5GB of RAM.

The MacBook is pegged at 8GB of RAM - I can't add any more than that. So just a very basic load, like above, and I'm almost maxed out on RAM on OSX. That is unacceptable to me - almost unusable.

Ubuntu or Mint on the MacBook runs flawlessly. Faster, smoother, way less system load. Multi finger gestures work perfectly out of the box. The Mac trackpad, incidentally, is a major reason to run Linux on a Mac rather than a commodity PC. PC trackpads suck. Running Linux gives you infinite configurability, whereas on the Mac it is limited in that regard.

So for me on an older Mac, Linux (or even Windows 8) is a better option. The hardware still performs flawlessly (have to hand it to Apple there) and a new OS just breathes new life into it.

What everyone seems to be forgetting in this is that employment is a zero sum game. If HR picks a female for the job ( to satisfy diversity quotas) all that does is put a white male out of work. What does that accomplish? Other than some feel good vibe for righting some supposed wrong. And if the woman is not very good at the job, what will that lead to? Her fellow employees will resent her.

I'll put it as succinctly as I can - if the female is better qualified than the male applicant then by all means hire the female. If the male is better qualified then hire the guy.

All of this "we should have X % of _whatever_ in a job" is nonsense.

By the way, where does Van Vlack get this 20% number anyhow? Based on what, exactly? Is she seriously suggesting that 1 out of 5 IT employees be female simply because they are women? With no regard to education, experience, aptitude and other qualifications? I suspect that she just pulled this number out of her ass.

Did it ever occur to Van Vlack, or any of these other diversity do gooders, that maybe just maybe women don't WANT an IT career? And that is why they are "under represented".

Tablets seem to be peaking. Pretty much anyone that wants one has one (or two) already. For those of us that do actual work on a computer, the tablet is sorely lacking.

With Microsoft basically giving away Windows to manufacturers of lower end PC's, the prices are continuing to fall.

Case in point - at Christmas I got my nephew an HP Stream Notebook. $200 and it has an SSD. It's actually pretty good and a lot more useful than any tablet I have used. Small, light weight, expandable storage, great battery life. And you can type on it.

Yes, good observation. I have found that to be true also.

I've been around long enough to see things comes and go. The current flavor of the month is "cloud". Cloud this, cloud that. Even the behemoths of the ERP world - Oracle and SAP - are making an aggressive push to "the cloud". Companies like Workday and Salesforce are growing at a tremendous rate.

It all seems very appealing. Say goodbye to multi year implementations and increasingly difficult and costly upgrades. Rent it by the seat rather than making large capital outlays. Fully object oriented design. Open standards vs. proprietary tools. Lots of great benefits.

But.....

As Willie Sutton once famously stated when asked why he robbed banks..."because that's where the money is". The data of your company, and other companies in the typical "multi-tenant" configuration is all in the one place. The bad guys know this. They will target these data centers to be sure.

You are essentially taking your data from an environment you can control (largely) to one you cannot. That is a huge leap of faith.

I expect that it is only a matter time before there will be a massive data breach for hosted cloud apps. We're not talking about someone's email account or twitter account. We're talking about an entire database full of SSN's and other personal information getting stolen. Everyone in your company and possibly customer and partner data as well. I don't want to be the one holding that press conference.

Oh and how do you suppose that came about? Shotgun wedding anyone :-D

If you are more than about 5 years into your career then academic credentials are not as important as you might think. Sure, some places require a 4 year degree but those are typically the IBM's and Deloitte's and who wants to work for them anyway? Experience is the key. If you are looking to move up the management chain then the degree is more important. If you're a tech then the only important question should be "can he/she code?".

What a surprise...yet another company jumps on the politically correct bandwagon. It seems that the strategy is to jump out ahead of this "issue" rather than wait for some shake down artist like Al Sharpton to come knocking on your door.

The quotes around "issue" are intentional, indicating that there is no issue at all. The reason that there is a lower representation in Tech is simply that there are fewer applicants that are Black or female or from other minority groups. Simple as that. All you have to do is take a walk around a college campus and visit a CS101 class. What will you see? Predominantly white males and asians. Is that because colleges are discriminating against others in their CS programs? Of course not. It just means that those people chose to study other things.

If Intel wants to give money to historically black colleges that's great. I'm all in favor of that. But to suggest that it will fix some supposed problem is ridiculous. In typical American fashion, the solution to every problem is to throw more money at it. It rarely works. To blame companies for "not hiring enough people from group X" is certainly convenient, and probably popular in some circles, but in the end its not accurate.

Companies hire from the pool of labor that is available to them. To suggest that they are overlooking qualified people because of the color of their skin or their gender is absurd. It is nothing more than a thinly veiled racism/sexism charge to which there is no substantial evidence to support it.

Quite frankly, there is more evidence to support discrimination based on age or medical health than age or gender. Where is the outrage over that? Where are all the big companies promising to throw all sorts of money to address it? Crickets.

The Amazon phone takes something cool (Android) and locks it down Apple style. Apple can get away with it because they have perceived value in better quality hardware/design/vertical integration/app selection, etc. Amazon doesn't offer any of those benefits. So it ends up coming off as a cheap, locked down Android phone with crummy hardware and many of the good parts of Android missing. There are other cheap Android phones you can buy that offer more than the Amazon phone.

What Amazon needs to do is offer something the other guys can't offer. Give customers free shipping on anything they buy from Amazon using their phone. Or maybe a half price Amazon Prime deal for the duration of the 2 year contract. Make it possible to add Google Services without having to root the phone. Stuff like that.

Simply putting out yet another cheap Android phone is simply a race to the bottom. But a mostly stock Amazon branded Android phone with some cool Amazon services bundled in with it - now you're cooking with gas.

That's a fair point and it's why I suggest keeping some C++ or such in your back pocket so you can ride out the ups and downs.

Here's why:

1) If your skills are limited to commonly used languages then a potential employer has a large pool of people to choose from. That means that you have to compete against a lot of people for a given position. It also means that your rate will be lower because a larger labor pool will tend to drive down prices. If, OTOH, you choose to focus on niche markets it will have the exact opposite effect. Fewer people to choose from and, therefore, higher hourly rate. Essentially it puts you (as an employee or contractor) more in the drivers seat.

2) It gives you something else to add to your resume.

3) It might give you exposure to industries that you might not have had otherwise.

4) It's fun :-)

Having said all of that, I still think that it is important to have a solid grounding in Java or C/C++. Why? Well, for one thing it gives you a good foundation for tackling other languages. It also gives you something else to fall back on if the esoteric thing doesn't quite pan out ;-)

I followed the link above and it shows a pretty impressive device. But it doesn't appear to come with any headphones. Now I would expect that on a $1200 music device you would not want to use crappy ear buds like the ones you get with an iPhone or Android phone. That would defeat the purpose of having a high end music player in the first place.

For $1200 I would expect it to come with a pair of high end, over the ear headphones. Something that might retail in the $300-400 range. That would better justify the price.

One more thing...how long will it be before we hear about someone getting robbed or shot over one of these things?

It is quite easy to make logical arguments for why it makes sense to work remotely. The problem is that the buck stops at your managers desk. If you are fortunate enough to have an enlightened manager that trusts you to get things done then you will likely both benefit.

Unfortunately there are still a lot of managers that have this rigid, old-school mentality that dictates that they must watch your every move, every day. They are more concerned with what time you come in to work and how long you take for lunch and how long your coffee break is than what you actually do all day. Sadly, some of them have no idea what you do. And they don't care. These are typically the people with no real skills. The type of people that see everything as some sort of power grab. The ones destined for middle management purgatory.

The good news is that it will change, whether they like it or not. I am seeing this already in my line of work. I used to have to travel every week. Now it's about twice a month, if that. On my end, I just need to make sure that I'm getting my stuff done on time at a high quality. Management - rather than focus on the nonsense above - can focus on productive tasks. And so can I.