Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:As the man says... (Score 1) 126

Snell updated the testing some time ago, the AC above is correct and 2009 a piece was run in the NY Times, written by a Motorcyclist editor:
http://jalopnik.com/5582380/ho...

The fundamental flaw was that the Snell testing did not account for the weight of a S-M-L head and the fact that foam density needed to change with head size as head weight changed.

Revised in 2010, and later standards, they did correct the issue. To be fair, Snell was already going to update the standards, they do so every 5 years since 1970.

I don't own a Snell rated helmet because only 2 Modular helmets pass the Snell 2010 tests and neither is the right shape for my head.

I wear a Shoei Multitech, which is ECE and DOT approved.

Comment Re:As the man says... (Score 1) 126

Not exactly true.

One of the benefits of a Snell rating, which is rare to find in anything but a $300 list price helmet (you can find deals of course) is the testing is done in Snell's labs, not the manufacturer's lab like DOT. (Hence part of the price difference)

Snell requires testing against significantly higher energy impacts as well.

 

Comment Re:As the man says... (Score 5, Insightful) 126

Except a standard $100 helmet vrs a standard $500 helmet is a huge improvement in safety and feature set.

The question is: is this a $100 helmet with $1299 of gadgets, or a $500 helmet with $799 of gadgets.

Maybe there will be a niche for this product, but I don't know of but a handful of motorcyclists interested in the helmet.

Slashdot Top Deals

An engineer is someone who does list processing in FORTRAN.

Working...