Don't spend other people's money. If you want spend money on those things, go ahead. If I want to buy stuff off of RG3's wedding registry, that's my prerogative.

Like most hung things, it is easier to take via water, even if the ground sea distance is much greater than a straight line approach.

The majority of the trip will be via barge.

Living in NYC, I used to think the same thing about power in the city.

Until Sandy.

The ATM's themselves were not compromised.

The bank's computers were compromised and the limits on ATM withdrawals was removed from certain accounts.

I think the number is closer to 20 that might try and print/assemble the gun.

If people would simply put, "it is reported" in tweets instead of "it is confirmed" (when it is not), we could really cut down on a lot of misinformation.

This is nonsense.

1) Don't create something new and better because other people will want to use it?

2) We are not smart enough to make anything better ever.

3) What are you talking about?

a more interesting question, would this be enough for widespread adoption of the newest 4k video standard?

CNN is reporting a massive drop in bitcoin exchange rates.

http://buzz.money.cnn.com/2013/04/10/bitcoin-bubble-burst/

It doesn't get half the MPG of my Chevy.

Try 31,000 / 317,000 or about .1 MPG.

You must not live in NYC. A twenty barely buys one drink at nice places.

It is too bad they are retiring igoogle and google reader, the two things I have as my start pages because they work so well without interruptions.

But I guess those interruptions is how google makes money and they want to force users onto those other platforms.

Maybe it makes up the difference in some but not all situations.

And how may TOP GUN type dog fights have American jet fighters had in the bast 20 years?

This is American military thinking. Spend 100's of billions of dollars on something that used to be relevant.

That is why something like this will almost never be appealed. The MPAA doesn't want to create any "bad law" for themselves.

And of course the winner can't "appeal" even if he wanted to create the precedent.