Comment Re:Animal House (Score 1) 765
It's up to them if they think it is acceptable to host that kind of thing in a public repo, or if they think it creates a bad impression because for them.
Not really.... legally, yes. Just in the same way, that your landlord could kick you out of the apartment, because he doesn't like the color of your bedsheets visible from outside your open window, or a web hosting provider can shutdown your site, because you posted a recipe for making something that calls for sugar, and the CXO finds sugar-laden foods offensive.
These are legally possibilities, but widely considered an overreach / improper behavior on the part of the service provider. Which could very much come back to haunt the provider and have negative consequences.
I would point out that Github has had plenty of time to act, if they intend to commit that overreach, and yet the project's still online, huh.
In a couple months it will probably fade into obscurity, and we'll have forgotten it ever existed ---- noone dare use the library in their serious project now.